Zero matrix with non-zero above diagonal

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter rputra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Zero
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for a matrix \( A \) of size \( k \times k \) with 1's directly above its diagonal, \( A^k = 0 \) and \( A^{k-1} \neq 0 \). The matrix example provided is \( \begin{pmatrix} 0 & 1 & 0 \\ 0 & 0 & 1 \\ 0 & 0 & 0 \end{pmatrix} \). The proof utilizes standard basis vectors \( e_1, e_2, e_3 \) and shows that \( A e_j = e_{j-1} \) for \( j > 1 \) and \( A e_1 = 0 \). By iterating this process, it is established that \( A^{k-1} e_k = e_1 \neq 0 \) while \( A^k e_j = 0 \) for all \( j \), confirming the initial claim.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of matrix multiplication and properties.
  • Familiarity with standard basis vectors in linear algebra.
  • Knowledge of matrix powers and their implications.
  • Basic concepts of linear transformations.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of nilpotent matrices and their implications in linear algebra.
  • Learn about the Jordan form of matrices and its relation to eigenvalues.
  • Explore induction proofs in linear algebra, particularly for matrix properties.
  • Investigate applications of matrix exponentiation in differential equations.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those focusing on linear algebra, matrix theory, and theoretical computer science. This discussion is beneficial for anyone looking to deepen their understanding of matrix behavior and properties.

rputra
Messages
35
Reaction score
0
I am working on this problem which has been baffling me since the beginning: Prove that $A^k = 0$ and $A^{k-1} \neq 0$ if $A_{k \times k}$ is a zero matrix but with entries of 1's right above its diagonal. For example, if $k = 3$ the it will look like this

$$\begin{pmatrix}
0 &1 &0\\
0 &0 &1\\
0 &0 &0\\
\end{pmatrix},$$

with small diagonal of 1's slanted parallel to the main diagonal. The hint I have been getting suggests me to use standard basis vectors. For example, in the case of $k = 3$, we have $e_1 = (1,0,0), \ e_2 = (0,1,0), \ e_3 = (0,0,1)$. Then I need to find out what are $Ae_1, \ Ae_2, \ Ae_3$, etc. After that I have to continue with $A^2 e_1, \ A^2 e_2, \ A^2 e_3,$ etc. But even with these hints, I am still confused. Any help or guidance will be very much appreciated. Thank you in advance for your help and effort.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Tarrant said:
I am working on this problem which has been baffling me since the beginning: Prove that $A^k = 0$ and $A^{k-1} \neq 0$ if $A_{k \times k}$ is a zero matrix but with entries of 1's right above its diagonal. For example, if $k = 3$ the it will look like this

$$\begin{pmatrix}
0 &1 &0\\
0 &0 &1\\
0 &0 &0\\
\end{pmatrix},$$

with small diagonal of 1's slanted parallel to the main diagonal. The hint I have been getting suggests me to use standard basis vectors. For example, in the case of $k = 3$, we have $e_1 = (1,0,0), \ e_2 = (0,1,0), \ e_3 = (0,0,1)$. Then I need to find out what are $Ae_1, \ Ae_2, \ Ae_3$, etc. After that I have to continue with $A^2 e_1, \ A^2 e_2, \ A^2 e_3,$ etc. But even with these hints, I am still confused. Any help or guidance will be very much appreciated. Thank you in advance for your help and effort.
The standard basis has the property that for any $k\times k$ matrix $A$, the vectors $Ae_1,\,Ae_2,\ldots,Ae_k$ are given by the columns of $A$. So for example in the case of the matrix $\begin{bmatrix} 0 &1 &0\\ 0 &0 &1\\ 0 &0 &0\\ \end{bmatrix},$ you can see that $Ae_1$ is the left column of $A$ which is the zero vector. The second column of $A$ tells you that $Ae_2 = e_1$, and the third column tells you that $Ae_3 = e_2.$

Using that information, you can then see what happens to higher powers of $A$. For example, $A^2e_2 = A(Ae_2) = Ae_1 = 0.$
 
Opalg said:
The standard basis has the property that for any $k\times k$ matrix $A$, the vectors $Ae_1,\,Ae_2,\ldots,Ae_k$ are given by the columns of $A$. So for example in the case of the matrix $\begin{bmatrix} 0 &1 &0\\ 0 &0 &1\\ 0 &0 &0\\ \end{bmatrix},$ you can see that $Ae_1$ is the left column of $A$ which is the zero vector. The second column of $A$ tells you that $Ae_2 = e_1$, and the third column tells you that $Ae_3 = e_2.$

Using that information, you can then see what happens to higher powers of $A$. For example, $A^2e_2 = A(Ae_2) = Ae_1 = 0.$

Thank you! I did note the properties you mentioned above, however, the big question is: How do you use the properties to arrive at the conclusion that $A^k = 0$ while $A^{k-1} \neq 0$? Thanks again and again, I am sincerely looking forward to hear from you again.
 
Tarrant said:
The big question is: How do you use the properties to arrive at the conclusion that $A^k = 0$ while $A^{k-1} \neq 0$? Thanks again and again, I am sincerely looking forward to hear from you again.
The effect of $A$ on the basis vector $e_j$ is that $Ae_j= e_{j-1}$ except when $j=1$, in which case $Ae_1=0.$ When you iterate $A$ $n$ times, you find that $A^ne_j = e_{j-n}$ unless $j-n\leqslant0$, in which case $A^ne_j = 0$. (To prove that carefully, you'll probably have to use induction on $n$.)

Now putting $n=k-1$ you see that $A^{k-1}e_k = e_1 \ne0$, so that $A^{k-1} \neq 0$. However, when you put $n=k$ you find that $j-k\leqslant0$, and hence $A^ke_j = 0$, for all $j$. Thus $A^k$ takes all the basis vectors to zero, which means that $A^k=0.$
 
Opalg said:
The effect of $A$ on the basis vector $e_j$ is that $Ae_j= e_{j-1}$ except when $j=1$, in which case $Ae_1=0.$ When you iterate $A$ $n$ times, you find that $A^ne_j = e_{j-n}$ unless $j-n\leqslant0$, in which case $A^ne_j = 0$. (To prove that carefully, you'll probably have to use induction on $n$.)

Now putting $n=k-1$ you see that $A^{k-1}e_k = e_1 \ne0$, so that $A^{k-1} \neq 0$. However, when you put $n=k$ you find that $j-k\leqslant0$, and hence $A^ke_j = 0$, for all $j$. Thus $A^k$ takes all the basis vectors to zero, which means that $A^k=0.$

Thanks again! I think I should have posted this problem earlier, I have been struggling with this problem for days. This form has been useful for me, I am all for it! Thank you again.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K