Zero resistivity in superconducting state

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of zero resistivity in superconductors, specifically through the lens of Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory. It clarifies that the term "net" in "small net attraction between electrons" refers to the balance of repulsive Coulombic forces and attractive phonon exchanges, leading to Cooper pair formation. The conversation highlights that while Cooper pairs can scatter, the absence of states on the backside of the Fermi surface prevents resistivity from occurring, thus maintaining infinite conductivity below the critical temperature (Tc).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer (BCS) theory
  • Knowledge of Cooper pair formation and its role in superconductivity
  • Familiarity with phonon interactions in solid-state physics
  • Basic concepts of Fermi surfaces and electron scattering
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical derivation of the superconducting energy gap in BCS theory
  • Explore the implications of phonon-mediated attraction in superconductors
  • Investigate the role of temperature in the behavior of Cooper pairs
  • Learn about the experimental techniques used to measure zero resistivity in superconductors
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, materials scientists, and electrical engineers interested in superconductivity, particularly those studying the mechanisms behind zero resistivity and Cooper pair dynamics.

vatlychatran
Messages
25
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,
- Could you explain for me the meaning of "net" in the phrase "small net attraction between electrons" in superconductivity, (or synonym of it)?
- We usually say that BSC theory explains the superconductivity of conventional superconductors, one feature of superconductivity is zero resistivity at temperature below Tc, but I don't know how Cooper pair formation and energy gap explain this behavior explicitly, Is there any formula of resistivity which includes superconducting gap? To explain resistivity in normal state we say that there are collisions between electrons and defects, lattice but why can't we imagine Cooper pair as a particle which also collides with defects and lattice?
(In books on superconductivity author usually derive energy gap and say that there is no collision without proving)
Thank you very much.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In a superconductor electrons on one hand side repell each other due to Coulombic forces. On the other hand there is attraction due to the exchange of phonons. Only for some frequency and wavevector values of the electrons the attraction is stronger than the repulsion. Hence net attraction.

The explanation for infinite conductivity is not straight forward. Also Cooper pairs scatter and get broken up. In contrast with a metal, where the electrons can get scattered to the "backside" of the Fermi surface, thus reducing the net current, in a superconductor there are no states on the backside due to the gap. Hence scattering cannot reduce net current. The excited or broken up Cooper pairs will sooner or later relax back to the original Cooper pairs forming the condensate.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K