"Zero thickness" error in SOL 600 (Patran)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion addresses a "zero thickness" error encountered in SOL 600 analysis using Nastran with Patran version 2010. The user reported that despite having properly defined properties for Quad4 elements, the error persisted until they rebuilt the model, which resolved the issue. The discussion also highlights potential causes such as constraint violations due to thermal expansion and suggests that the problem may relate to hour-glassing in under-integrated elements.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of SOL 600 analysis in Nastran
  • Familiarity with Patran version 2010
  • Knowledge of Quad4 element properties and constraints
  • Basic concepts of thermal expansion in finite element analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Investigate Nastran error handling for "zero thickness" issues
  • Learn about hour-glassing problems in under-integrated elements
  • Explore methods for defining constraints in finite element models
  • Review best practices for rebuilding models in Patran to avoid similar errors
USEFUL FOR

Finite element analysts, mechanical engineers, and users of Nastran and Patran who are troubleshooting modeling errors and optimizing their analysis workflows.

uribemax2
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I am doing a SOL 600 analysis but Nastran gives me an error of "zero thickness" in some elements. Obviously, I checked those elements and they have properly defined their properties so I don't know what can I do.

I've done a lot of linear and nonlinear static analysis in that model and all of them have run okey, therefore I suppose that the model is well constituted, where could be the problem?

The model is all formed by Quad4 elements and Patran version is 2010.

Thanks in advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm not familiar with Nastran, but other problem solvers give this type of error when the constraints are violated.

For example, the external thickness is limited to 0.010, and the layers add up to 0.010, but the external limit is violated when heat is applied, due to thermal expansion.
 
Many thanks for answering.

I tried to define constraints again but anything changed so I've rebuilt my model and surprisingly the problem has disappeared. I am working in a big model with a lot of parts and connectors so that could be the issue. It's a pity that I still don't know why it didn't work properly but now I can continue working so that's all.

Thanks for helping.
 
What kind of elements are you using? Sounds a lot like an hour-glassing problem that some under-integrated elements suffer from.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 65 ·
3
Replies
65
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K