Boundary conditions for a grid tube under combined loading

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on modeling the linear buckling behavior of a cylinder using ANSYS Mechanical (v14.5) with BEAM4 elements under combined loading conditions. The user is attempting to establish boundary conditions that maintain rigid ends while permitting motion due to axial compression and bending moments. The confusion arises from the results obtained after applying the CERIG command, which indicates that the buckling modes under combined loading are identical to those under pure axial compression. The user has successfully implemented master and slave nodes, but the boundary conditions may not be correctly set, leading to unexpected results.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ANSYS Mechanical (v14.5) software
  • Familiarity with BEAM4 element modeling
  • Knowledge of linear buckling analysis principles
  • Experience with boundary condition setup in finite element analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the correct application of the CERIG command in ANSYS Mechanical
  • Explore advanced boundary condition techniques for combined loading scenarios
  • Learn about the differences in buckling modes under various loading conditions
  • Investigate the use of master-slave node configurations in ANSYS for accurate results
USEFUL FOR

Engineers and analysts working with finite element modeling, particularly those focusing on buckling analysis in structural applications using ANSYS Mechanical.

Vigardo
Messages
87
Reaction score
7
Dear experts,

I´m trying to model in ANSYS Mechanical (v14.5) the linear buckling behavior of a cylinder made of BEAM4 elements under combined loading (axial compression and bending moment) applied at the ends.

How should I set up the boundary conditions of a cylinder to keep rigid the ends while allowing their motion under both compressive force and moment?

After rigidifying one end of a cylinder made of BEAM4 elements with the CERIG command (CERIG,P) I´ve found confusing results: the buckling modes under combined loading are equal to the modes obtained only under pure axial compression. All nodes from the other end were fully clamped. I think that I successfully selected master and slave nodes and that the results from the initial static analysis seem ok, i.e. the moment applied at the master node node leads to some curvature and the axial force to some compression while the end nodes keep rigid.

What am I doing wrong? Any comments would be highly appreciated.

Thanks a lot in advance!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
37K