Force constant of a spring launching a satellite

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves designing a spring to launch a satellite with specific speed and acceleration requirements. It relates to concepts in mechanics, particularly energy conservation and spring dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the relationship between the spring constant, compression distance, and the energy equations involved. There is uncertainty about how to incorporate acceleration into the energy balance and how to resolve the multiple unknowns present in the problem.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on simplifying the problem by ignoring certain terms and suggested using the maximum acceleration to derive additional equations. There is an ongoing exploration of how to relate the spring force to the motion of the satellite.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the assumption of negligible gravitational potential energy and the challenge posed by having multiple unknowns in the equations. The discussion reflects a collaborative effort to clarify the relationships between the variables involved.

ph123
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
You are asked to design a spring that will give a 1200 kg satellite a speed of 3.80 m/s relative to an orbiting space shuttle. Your spring is to give the satellite a maximum acceleration of 5.00g. The spring's mass, the recoil kinetic energy of the shuttle, and changes in gravitational potential energy will all be negligible.

a) What must the force constant of the spring be?

b) What distance must the spring be compressed?

I don't really know how to approach this problem, since without the spring constant (k), you cannot find the distance the spring is compressed (x) and vice versa.

But, according to the problem,

0.5kx^2 + mgh = 0.5mv^2 +5mgh
0.5kx^2 = 0.5mv^2 + 4mgh
kx^2 = mv^2 + 8mgh
k = (mv^2 + 8mgh)/x^2

I know this has to be wrong because there are three unknowns, h, x, and k. Can someone help me approach this differently?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You were told to ignore the gravitational potential energy, so drop the mgh terms. Then your energy equation is correct, but you still have two unknowns. Now use the condition that the maximum acceleration the spring is supposed to impart is 5g. (F=ma etc).
 
0.5mv^2 = 0.5kx^2

I am not seeing how to incorporate acceleration into this equation. To find the work done by the force of the spring,

F= ma = 5mg * x = 5mgx ??
 
For a spring, F=k*x, right? You don't incorporate it into that equation, you derive another equation. 2 equations+2 unknowns=happiness.
 
ahhhh.

so

F=kx
5mg=kx
x=(5mg)/k

0.5mv^2 = 0.5kx^2
mv^2 = kx^2
mv^2 = k([5mg]/k)^2
mv^2 = k(25m^2g^2)/(k^2)
k = (25mg^2)/v^2

right? i think so, yay
 

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K