Does Coriolis really cause water to drain one way?

Click For Summary
The Coriolis effect is often cited as the reason water drains clockwise in the Southern Hemisphere and counter-clockwise in the Northern Hemisphere, but this is largely a myth. The forces from Coriolis are minimal compared to random disturbances in a water basin, which significantly influence the direction of drainage. Demonstrations claiming to show the Coriolis effect often manipulate conditions to create the desired outcome, such as pre-existing circular motion in the water. Observations at the equator further complicate the myth, as water drains straight down without swirling. Overall, the consensus is that the Coriolis effect does not play a significant role in the direction of water drainage.
belliott4488
Messages
661
Reaction score
1
We've all heard that water spirals down the drain in a clockwise direction in the Southern hemisphere and counter- (or anti-) clockwise in the Northern hemisphere, due to the Coriolis effect from the rotation of the Earth. I've also heard that this is a myth, and that if you calculate the actual forces involved, those due to Coriolis are negligibly small compared to the random perturbations that typically occur in a basin of water that was filled relatively recently (or otherwise disturbed). The latter sounds likely to me, yet the "myth" persists, and moreover, you can see demonstrations of it on YouTube: .

In this video, it appears that the water behaves as advertised, even though the basins are displaced from each other by no more than 10 meters or so. Yet, the one on the North side of the equator drains clockwise, the one on the South the opposite, and most amazingly, the one right on the equator doesn't swirl at all, but just drains straight down the hole!

How can this be? I thought the Coriolis force depended on a change in the radial component of position, but in these cases it's hard to see how that's not completely negligible.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The water effect is a myth; Coriolis forces are nowhere near that strong. If you do a forums search, you'll find quite a comprehensive thread about it elsewhere in PF.
 
If you look at the third "experiment" there is a bit of dirt in the bowl before he let's the plug out. This is already moving in a circular fashion, so it suggests that the water is poured into a bowl in a clever way so that it drains however they want it to.

This is the most common misconception, in my opinion. In the past, no-one has believed me when I tried to argue against it, so I've given up trying now! As danger says, a search of the forums will return a lot of threads on the topic.
 
Okay, thanks for confirming my suspicions. We can drop this thread, since it's been covered before.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...

Similar threads