A two trains problem (distance and speed)

  • Thread starter Thread starter missrikku
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Speed Trains
AI Thread Summary
Two trains traveling towards each other at 30 km/hr are 60 km apart when a bird flies between them at 60 km/hr. The time it takes for the trains to collide is calculated to be 3600 seconds. Using this time and the bird's speed, the total distance the bird travels is determined to be 60,000 meters. The method used to solve the problem is confirmed as correct, highlighting the efficiency of calculating the total distance directly rather than summing an infinite series. Overall, the solution is accurate and well-executed.
missrikku
Hello, this is the problem:

Two trains, each having a speed of 30 km/hr, are headed at each other on the same straight track. A bird that can fly 60 km/hr flies off the front of one train when they are 60 km apart and heads directly back for the other train. On reaching the other train it flies directly back to the first train, and so forth. What is the total distance the bird travels?

With this information, I came up with the following:

Vbird = 60 km/hr = 16.667 m/s
Vtrain1 = 30 km/hr = Vtrain2 = 8.333 m/s
d = distance between trains when bird 1st flies off = 60km

I) I found out how long it would take for the cars to hit each other:

Vtrain1 = Vtrain2 = 8.333 m/s = 3.0 x 10^4 m / t
** 3.0 x 10^4 m came from doing d/2 or 60km/2 = 30km
t = 3600s

II) I used Vbird to find the total distance it traveled:

16.667 = total distance / 3600s
total distance = 6.0 x 10^4 m

Giving me the ans: 6.0 x 10^4 m

Was my process for answering this problem correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you know the speed of the bird and you know time it was flying: the product gives the total distance flown.

Of course you could try to do it the HARD way: calculate each leg back and forth and do it as an infinite series!

There is an old story about a famous mathematician (VonNeumann? I've also heard it about Wiener.) that a man asked this problem of him and he thought for a few seconds and immediately gave the correct answer. The man chuckled and said "A lot of people try to do that by summing the infinite series." VonNeumann looked puzzled and said "But I did sum an infinite series!"

(You are now to roll on the floor laughing!)
 
  • Haha
Likes scottdave


Yes, your process for answering this problem is correct. You correctly identified the variables and used the given information to solve for the total distance the bird traveled. Your calculation for the time it takes for the trains to hit each other is also correct. Overall, your solution is clear and accurate. Good job!
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top