Introducing Yourself to Compact and Non-Compact Lie Algebras

guillom
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi
I'm looking for a guide to introduce muyself in the study of compact and non compact Lie algebras. Please take a minute to signal me some bibliography al the respect.
Thank very much
Guillom
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Carter Seagal MacDonald's book whose name escapes me is very good. As is Fulton and Harris Representation Theory.
 


Hi Guillom,

Welcome to the world of Lie algebras! It's a fascinating and complex subject, but don't worry, I'll try my best to give you some resources to get started.

Firstly, for a general introduction to Lie algebras, I recommend the book "Lie Algebras in Particle Physics" by Howard Georgi. It covers the basics of Lie algebras and their applications in physics.

For a more specific focus on compact and non-compact Lie algebras, I suggest "Lie Groups, Lie Algebras, and Representations" by Brian Hall. This book provides a thorough treatment of both types of Lie algebras and their representations.

Another great resource is the book "Lie Algebras, Part I" by Jacobson. It covers a wide range of topics in Lie algebras, including both compact and non-compact cases.

If you prefer online resources, I recommend checking out the lectures by Professor Frederic Schuller on YouTube. He has a series of lectures on Lie algebras, including ones specifically on compact vs non-compact algebras.

I hope these recommendations help you get started in your study of compact and non-compact Lie algebras. Happy learning!
 
Thread 'Determine whether ##125## is a unit in ##\mathbb{Z_471}##'
This is the question, I understand the concept, in ##\mathbb{Z_n}## an element is a is a unit if and only if gcd( a,n) =1. My understanding of backwards substitution, ... i have using Euclidean algorithm, ##471 = 3⋅121 + 108## ##121 = 1⋅108 + 13## ##108 =8⋅13+4## ##13=3⋅4+1## ##4=4⋅1+0## using back-substitution, ##1=13-3⋅4## ##=(121-1⋅108)-3(108-8⋅13)## ... ##= 121-(471-3⋅121)-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24(471-3⋅121## ##=121-471+3⋅121-3⋅471+9⋅121+24⋅121-24⋅471+72⋅121##...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...

Similar threads

Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top