I'm not sure if it is what you're looking for, but it seems to refer to p. 24 of this: http://cds.cern.ch/record/2120817/files/SPSC-SR-177.pdf
It just mentions that the storage time is more than 1.08 years.
Apparently it is right. I put this crazy thing in an online expression simplifier (it would take a while to do it by hand): ##ρGM(r+l-d)(\frac{1}{r^2+rl}-\frac{1}{d^2+d(r+l-d)})+ρGM(d-r)(\frac{1}{r^2+rl}-\frac{1}{r^2+r(d-r)})## and it gave me 0, which means that...
Ok I think I've got it this time: starting from the bottom, I find the acceleration of the piece of strand from O to l (which is smaller than the acceleration of the strand as a whole), I subtract it from the acceleration of the entire strand, and I multiply it by the mass of the upper piece of...
Are you telling me that performing an experiment involving sucking noodles with the utmost precision has no practical application? What are you going to say next, that it's useless to think of how many angels can dance on the head of a pin? :biggrin:
...oh... I feel a bit awkward now...
Let's assume we have a detector that can always detect an atom if it's there, and does not cause issues like polluting it with more atoms. And let's call "very long" something "easy" at first, 100 seconds.
It's all relative, and that's why I said less...
It's a 'joke", an expression, don't take it literally.
Well, someone mentioned deep space. Out there you'd find less than an atom per cc. I'm not sure exactly how many there are in interstellar space, because sources seem to say from 1 atom per cubic meter to 1 atom per cc. Theoretically you...
Oh wait, there'
Ah ok, that makes sense. So I don't have to add them, I can just evaluate the force with which that segment is pulling the other upwards or downwards.