No need to be rude...
Given that Caltech scored higher than Berkeley in three of the links I visited, I think it's fair to say that Caltech's physics courses are better than Berkeley's...
I find that slightly hard to believe, but I will take your word for it. That said - you get my point, and if UCB was a poor example, take your pick of any big state school.
:)Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
I don't hate them at all, in fact I love the royal family and I love Britain. (No I'm not British.)
What I hate is how some woman from the royal family has a baby and it's covered all day, every day, for a week or two, on every news station. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Excuse me, but I didn't realize you were the one dictating what I can and cannot do with my time. It's my time - I'll do what I want with it. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
Battery University is a good place to start. Take a look at these as well:
http://www.elec.eng.osaka-cu.ac.jp/~aevc/733-737.pdf (PDF)
http://www.solar-facts.com/batteries/battery-charging.php
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead%E2%80%93acid_battery#Cycles
My question is why?
What makes them so much better than a school such as UC Berkeley? (No offense, UCB grads. It's a great school but it's fact that it's not considered a best in the world school like Caltech or Stanford.)
I've been working hard academically to meet the requirements to go to Caltech for a while now, though I was recently thinking, other than the benefit, albeit a major one, of having a big name school on your résumé, are there any benefits to going to universities like Caltech, Stanford, Harvard...