Recent content by Fra

I think there are two issues with electrical currents in the body. 1) At once extreme is tissue damage ~ internal or external burns, but this takes quite some energy. 2) But long before that at much lower energies the main risk of cardiac arrythmia which is the main issue to start with...

Alot can be said about that "defintions" of states and measurements are cast in the language of linear algebra as the mathematical structure used in QM is based on assuming the "wavefunctions" form linear spaces...even with that in place people do "interpret".. Assmuing you are approaching this...

I don't agree the essence of the ideas are traditional Bohmian philosophy. I do however see a conceptual relation to the non-traditional "solipsist hidden variables", even thought that is only conceptually, the actual theory is still missing. But as I see it, agent-defined "solipsist" hidden...

This is a good question, and while it is a mathematical concept in the abstractions, just like there are different "interpretations" of probability, that must somehow be reflected in physical view of "sampling". In a pure minimal statistical interpretation, like the typical one for QM, the...

The conceptual idea in several your links are indeed just in line with what I mention! although there are many deep and difficult open problems with the approaches, so tricky that I think many are rejected by the ideas. Some quotes from the references illustrating the conceptual hooks...

Yes I think it's related... 1) Different observers generally have different incompatible information, this may sometimes be cured by transformations that defines the communication, and this is then related to interaction terms. When no transformations exists, perhaps one can consider the...

That term, is from Barandes... You are right of course Bell did not use that term, neither do I, but however we label it, it is IMO one of two key assumptions going into Bell's ansatz. I mean this ansatz in Bells's paper -- https://cds.cern.ch/record/111654/files/vol1p195-200_001.pdf IMO, if...

Given that Barande rejects the markov divisibility (which is the KEY problem in Bell ansatz that is essentially the same as the "physicists ignorance" assumption) then we do NOT have kind of causality that bells theorem applies to, so it's fair to give it a new name. I think it's not just a...

This is the point. My view, and I think that is one Barandes keys as well is that the ansatz of Bell simply does not apply to the general case. Barandes puts is so that markov divisibility is wrong in the general case - and them specificially in the case of quantum interactions. The difficulty...

I planned to comment more detail but lodbrok responded well on the filtering part so no need to rephrase that. So I will shorten my comments, and focus on what I think the key points and the focus of the thread? As already said in the thread, the full unfiltered data at Alice/1 & Bob/4 is not...

Yes. At least if you think of the physical state of the cards. One probably needs the gaming context, to make the illustration. With photons and electronics the context is inteactions with the polarizer for example, but the corresponding interaction between the state of the deck, and a betting...

The final correlated 1&4 pairs are not even defined until Chris has tagged the matches and communicated to Alice and Bob so they can "filter" the random pairs. The fact that 1&4 has never been in contact, does not matter because it's not how the remotely entangled systems are constructed...

It is trivial becase we explained the correlation but haven't specified a interaction at say Alice which involves her deck. To just "look at the deck" is trivial, it's hard to get some interferences out of that. I think the challenge is find an "interaction" involving the deck states that we...

I think Dr Chinese meant that it's up to those that suggest that we can understand the logic of "quantum entanglement" outside of physics, such as in human interations - to complete the example. (Reasonable i admit!) I think it may be possible but it takes some creativity to construct an...

Before I say anyone I am sensing again the old confusion what nonlocality means. We know that what Bell means, it's essentially the violation of the inequality; this KIND of "nonlocality" is of course not a problem per see and does not imply FTL-violations. My personal take on the "remote...