Recent content by Fysicus

  1. F

    Correlation function poles in Peskin's derivation of LSZ formula

    That's true, so just so I'm understanding it correctly a quick recap, thinking of the whole thing as a function in p^{0}: We've got an expression which is a sum over poles in p^{0} - with positions determined by the energies E_{\textbf{p}} corresponding to given states...
  2. F

    Correlation function poles in Peskin's derivation of LSZ formula

    Hey p-brane, thanks for the reply. So implicit in the first steps you make there is that at the pole region only: p^{0} \rightarrow E_{\textbf{p}} Basically you can argue 'backwards' and reinterpret E_{\textbf{p}}p^{0} where instead: E_{\textbf{p}} \rightarrow p_{0} ...
  3. F

    Correlation function poles in Peskin's derivation of LSZ formula

    Hi folks, Been trying to fill some of the more formal gaps in my knowledge by tackling the more technical stuff in P&S Chapter 7. Their derivation of the LSZ formula is quite different to those of books like, say, Srednicki, as they basically Fourier transform the whole argument as I...
Back
Top