Would this correction for infinite nuclear mass need a second correction in the event of a relativistic collision? In this situation, would we take the mass rest convention?
Ok and thanks again
I found a little bit of material talking more deeply about it on the website below, in case I can't put external sites here, let me know that I change. thank you!
https://www.fossilhunters.xyz/hydrogen-atom/the-rydberg-constant-a-fundamental-constant.html#:~:text=The Rydberg...
The question of physical meaning was not very clear to me. I believe it is a conceptual issue. I will look for some material on, if I have any indication, I will be grateful. And with respect to the variation of the Rydberg constant for larger atomic masses, it really makes sense, I hadn't...
With regard to Rutherford's atomic model, and Rydberg's discovery in general for the hydrogen distribution lines, what does Rydberg's constant physically mean? Its unit is m ^ -1, as if it were a rate, but it was not clear to me its physical meaning.
And why does it grow with atomic mass...