Oh, think I figured it out. This might be where the inexactitude you mentioned is coming in:
The ##x## in the previous message is the amplitude. Now we can plug it into ##mgh = \frac{1}{2}kA^{2}## which we derive from the conservation of energy equation:
##h = \frac{kA^{2}}{2mg} = 0.2536m##...
We also know ##T = 216 N## from the original post, given the ultimate strength of the wire. So,
##T = kx - mg##
##216 N = kx - (0.5 kg)(9.8 \frac{m}{s^{2}})##
##kx = 220.9 N##
##x = \frac{220.9 N}{k} = 0.0113 m##
Dimensionally this resolves properly. However, the solution in the textbook is...
Oh, I see. If ##T = kx - mg = ma## is at its maximum then acceleration needs to be maximum. As a result, we want ##cos(\omega t + \alpha) = 1## and ##sin(\omega t + \alpha) = 0##.
This makes sense because this sets ##x = Acos(\omega t + \alpha)## to its max ##x = A##.
We also know that in SHM ##x = A cos(\omega t + \alpha)##, where ##\omega^{2} = \frac{k}{m}##. So,
##v = \frac{dx}{dt} = - \omega A sin(\omega t + \alpha)##
##a = \frac{d^{2}x}{dt^{2}} = - \omega^{2} A cos(\omega t + \alpha)##
KE is maximum where ##a = 0## at ##cos(\omega t + \alpha) = 0## and...
I think I'm starting to get somewhere. We know, due to the starting state of lifting and dropping that the initial speed, ##v_{0} = 0##. Additionally, we know that ##KE = mgh## at the point of peak tension. Therefore,
## \Delta KE = \frac{1}{2} \times m \times v_{f}^{2} - \frac{1}{2} \times m...
Hi, I solved part (a) and will provide my solution below. However, I've been working on part (b) for quite a bit and reviewed the provided, relevant text a few times now but haven't been able to find what I'm missing:
Solution (a):
Using ##A = \frac{\pi \times d^{2}}{4}##, ##k =...
Hi!
In reading about Superconductivity and its current state of only being achieved in super cooled or heated materials. This sparked a question the following question:
What is the result of the trade off between energy saved by avoiding dissipation through the natural resistance of a material...
Hello,
I'm currently working through Purcell and Morin, Electricity and Magnetism textbook and came across a problem in which the goal is to verify the inverse square law. I'm worked through and completed the problem. However, I'm confused how this verifies the inverse square law, I'm posting...
Ah, I think my sign error is a result of improperly setting up my cross product calculation with respect to the final velocity. Once fixed it looks like the sign is fixed because what was previously ##L_{P, f}^{sys} = I_{cm} + md^{2} + \frac{1}{2}dmv_{f}## becomes ##L_{P, f}^{sys} = I_{cm} +...