Recent content by Jonathan

Well, firstly it is technically not of our gov'tment's concern, they are not citizens. But it would be the decent thing to do to try to be as understanding as possible. The difference is that the captive logically knows that this is not being done to demean or defile them, it is being done for...

Then what are we arguing about?

I agree, the answer is no. They are completely worthless as an international anything because they make all those rules but won't ever punish those who break them. Many are upset because the US broke the rules in order to punish Saddam for breaking the rules, but the UN did nothing to Saddam...

I gave you the link to a nice site, look for yourself.

No, the channel isn't a joke, the show is. I hope it comes back and I wish they'd put more X-Files on too.

1)quality gyro 2)two sci books 3)gift certificates to book stores

Heres another: Nihilists are right. LOL.

Well, my pet theory is so similar to yours that if you made the changes I suggested they would be pretty much the same. I can only think of two things you could do with this theory at this point. One is to research the Michelson-Morley experiment and recreate it exactly only in the vertical...

This guy's threads are becoming increasingly nonsensical, as he claims that the Two Witnesses will come soon, but he has not explained why there don't appear to have been any of the Great Plagues or the army of 200 million horse men to kill a third of the people, which must occur before they...

Shaving beards has a practical use: they hide what you look like, shaving them makes your face easier to see. It makes perfect sense to me that it is hard to tell one bearded guy from another, esp. if the all the beards are large. Then again, if there is only one bearded guy there then there...

No, I think it is very clearly saying: POW=A1/(A2a+A2b+A2c+A2d)/A3/A4/A5/A6/B1/B2 Where '/' is 'or' and '+' is 'and'. However, I admit to only reading it for grammar, not for content, so I do not know if it makes it clear in the content of any of those that there are no '+'. But I did read...

Well, no, but the fifth amendment specifically mentions capital crimes, if that's not too vague. Go to: http://www.law.emory.edu/FEDERAL/usconst.html

My point was that China is now in space, and is therefore yet another competitor with the US for complete control of the solar system. Granted, it'll be a long time before any group owns the moon, and the US would likely win such a competition if it occurred now. The DoD's budget on space...

If you restrict it even more the possibility that you are a figment of someone else's imagination comes into play, by which one can't even be sure of one's own existence.

In response to both deda and krab, the theory of perpetual motion then is Newton's first law.