If these guys don't have their guns, they'll find, make, or use something else. Homemade pipe bombs are easy, for example. So I doubt taking guns away will make any difference at all.
I'm moving into a new apartment, closer to work and school. Judging by what was left behind, the previous tenant may have had a foot fungus or nail fungus. What's a good, cheap way to sanitize the carpet?
Here's a pretty thorough discussion about it:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=121732
and
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=226
and
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=3257
My heart is with physics, but I know that a Liberal Arts education is a better fit. The thing is, as I read through the literature and programs, I have become confused:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bowdoin_College"
I'm interested in a liberal arts degree. I see these majors but I don't see...
Their example isn't exactly the best one to learn from. But this is merely an example you've given. You're not really arguing against my point:
It's beneficial to judge another culture.
I certainly hope they do. And they do. But how would improvement eventually come forth if we (and they) just ignored what they see as atrocities? To not even look at each other and not examine how the other does things can't lead to much progress.
:tongue:
sorry, just saw this after posting...
But they're still judging things, interpreting results, gauging successes. I mean, he's called a "judge." And he's determining in his best judgment whether something is true.
I don't see a difference.
No, I don't. Now, I'm not suggesting an active intervention. But what's wrong with looking at another culture and saying, "that's just wrong"? Do we not need to examine how other peoples conduct themselves and compare results? It seems to me that judging another legal system is a reasonable...