Recent content by MDEarl

Sorry, I meant Chalnoth

Chalntoth, The CMBR seems to be one of the most controversial issues in cosmology today. It was my impression that no one can explain it, and there are many theories. I have to agree that GR is better than alternative models, but my point is that no model is "spot on". GR works for smaller...

w4, I think a more difficult aspect to accept is that if all elements expand equally (volumetrically), that we would not notice. But Ʃ Δv = ΔV , and it is conceivable. I believe that you concur from your statement. Revolutionary motion, as you mention, w4, was a problem with me, but i have...

back again. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "Also, the equation you wrote down implies that objects of different masses will end up having difference sizes, and so it's difficult to understand how to make sense of your particular equations. For...

intreresting response w4... I just returned and have to go out for a while, but I am sure I can convincingly address your points when I get back, - since I gave this a lot of thought, and can't quite remember what eddington said, but as I recall, he differed from my thoughts and I resolved that...

I'm finally back. The suspicion that I have regarding the universe has not been resolved in my mind for many reasons. I question the very foundation of gravity, because it seems that there is a major disconnect between Newtonian gravity and GR. GR, as far as I have seen, has been only...

I'm not well-versed in einstein's field equations either. My point is, the classical calculation that i proposed works out perfectly as a sort of "reverse" Newton's law. that is...by describing an expanding volume produced by a mass, an acceleration (spacial expansion) field is produced which...

Food for thought…an open question to the board: A spherical volume defined as V ≡ 4/3 Π R ³ undergoes constant accelerated volume expansion generated by its mass M. The simplest equation for this is: Av = d²V/dt² = CE x M . The two equations lead to instantaneous volume velocities of...

Thanks Marcus, you’re right. I read somewhere that Friedmann was an early proponent of Einstein’s work and assumed the “classical derivation” of his formulas came first. Not so. Also, Sorry I used R instead of a, I hope you don’t mind me continuing it, I get confused using a for a distance...

This pertains, especially since alchemist mentioned an exponential expansion. Of course the universe continues to expand, but no model to date has been able to describe it without complicated addendums such as dark matter and energy and the cosmo. constant. I have a mathematical question and...