AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAARRRRRGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Thanks man, i was looking at a circle. Why, why why why. Hahah, wish i could more than like your answer.
Yes, and that would be the radius in I=P/(4*π*r2), but my question is why there is an extra 4 in the divider, does that not make it so that i only look at the quarter circle and would that imply that the book answer is only looking at the edge of the phone that is touching the face or somesuch...
Yeah, im thinking of going into teaching since i enjoy it so much but time will tell i guess, for now i might make a Youtube video or two on topics i struggle with and try to make them really easily accessible, see if i can pick up something from "teaching" into the void, haha.
My question is specifically with calculating the intensity. The book solution is
I=P/(4*pi*r^2)
but would this not give me a weaker electrical amplitude in the final calculation after plugging it in to
I=(1/2)*√(ε0/μ0)*(E02) ?