Recent content by memarf1

Ok, well, I have changed the formatting, thank you for your continued help, ill check back in in the morning. Thanks again. Im just looking for the 2 equations to plug into the runge kutta 4. I hope you can help. I have another post with my C++ code in it, but the code is correct. I just...

yes, that is correct. Off Subject, but what is latex? Please continue your help.

Im trying to turn this equation into 2 separate equations in order to place it in a runge kutta problem. This is the proposed problem and conditions: \frac{d^2f}{dx^2} + f = 0 allowing f (x) = A\cos x + B\sin x f ' (x) = -A\sin x + B\cos x f '' (x) = -A\cos x - B\sin x and g =...

Russ, by your definition Relitivity would never play a part. If we ever hope to travel at speeds close to the speed of light we will have to use mechanical engines which will not tear themselves apart. Not only that but in space we will have to find a way to eliminate the heat emmitted by the...

rbj is correct, it is only a unit. The answer to why is it so large compared to particle physics proportions cannot really be answered easily. That question is like asking why a meter is so large compared to a millimeter. We will not truly know why a mass is large or small until we know the...

I don't even know what flame baiting is. The question although referring to a car, does not refer to a normal car, not only that, but he asks about limits. And, As I stated before, the only limits that a MECHANICAL engine would have, would be due to relativity. Normal cars reach more than one...

The original question was updated in the third response on this thread. It was not OBVIOUSLY for only cars.

Its really commendable that you can split hairs and completely miss the point. Have you ever had a physics class? Just so you know, I have had many, and at least in Physics A, B and Modern Physics, as well as Mechanics and Mathematical physics, this exact question is posed. What is the...

I believe rbj just wanted to use some very large words. He quoted me correctly but not completely. I stated that the size was relative to what it is compared to. To the other guy, yes, the original question was about particle physics and as I also stated in some of my above responses, I...

Thank you Icebreaker, you are absolutely correct. Stingray, you must not know a whole lot about relativity considering you don't even know about the fabric of space. When I refer to the threading of space I am referring to the fabric which if you know anything about relativity you cannot deny...

ok, Planck mass density is another story, but the original question was of Planck mass, and I did say that it was very small, but I was thinking about the Planck length when I said that. In reference to particle physics yes, the Planck mass is large, but in the grand scheme of things its very...

Pervect, I really do not know why you would accuse me of flaming or baiting flaming, however, yes there is such a thing as threading of space and time. Although you may have heard it called something else, suck as the fabric of space. This is learned much when being taught about Einstein's...

Please help me, does anyone know what is wrong with this?

Planck Mass = 2.18E-8 kg Planck Length = 1.6161E-35 m Planck Time = 5.39E-44 s I say these are VERY VERY VERY SMALL!

Oh My Gosh This website elludes me. I can't believe the questions some people ask. First, The Planck Mass is VERY VERY VERY SMALL! Second, c, the speed of light is a VERY VERY VERY LARGE SPEED, NOT SMALL!