Dear Doron,
Take a look at my thread “Dimensions”, please.
Here my view at this subject. Your Real-Line has some intersection with my thought. Does exist any math for description of this static 0-D and 1-D (in your paper) as the dynamic process? In my opinion...
As this a thread has been moved here from General Physics for a mention of the supreme spheres, then it is a good occasion to discuss this question here.
I suggest to make it from a such position:
higher dimension - more complex structure and movement.
So, what the supreme spheres...
I agree. In my opinion the photon does not disappear in atom. It is inbuilt in a circulating wave increasing its frequency and, therefore, energy. It can be compared with a braided chain in which one part is added at preservation of the general length.
Michael
It seems strange, but the reason is the equivalence of speed of carrier of force (photon) and of internal speed of mass.
Two absolute speed at their interaction does cause the relative speed of objects.
It looks like a philosophical category sooner.
But there should be a physical explanation of this philosophical category.
Comparitive property of quantified force causes various action on various bodies. It is possible to say that a force "analyzed" magnitude of mass.
This...
A photon as a carrier of force has the maximal speed by definition –nothing can move faster then its carrier, since the speed of carrier of force is absolute.
As the concept of speed means movement of some observable object we should take into account presence or absence of mass at this...
If the photon directly moves atom then it is a carrier of force.
Here a question on existence of such concept as a “primary force” arise .
Any displays of forces can be reduced to an action of a primary force.
Let's assume, you are going on the car.
What a force moves it?
To receive the answer on this question it is necessary to find out two thing:
The first
- Whether can relativity cause an absoluteness.
The second
-Whether can absoluteness cause a relativity:
To be more physics than philosophy, we’ll examine these concepts at a concrete physical...
We live in the world where these concepts has the various interpretations. Anyone can have an own understanding about their origin and mutual connections. But, at least, one question remains open - what of these is a primary?
Michael
Some effects should define properties of anti-G-matter. If G-matter is object having mass then it is necessary to define what effects creates mass and then to invert them. Whether exist anti-G-matter as well as whether it is necessary for the universe this is another question.