Recent content by Mordred

ok it may help to look at the equation in regards to the constraints to a single scalar field. Now while the second paper doesn't show that equation specifically it does provides the momentum constraints in section B see 33,34,35 further detail can be referenced by the second papers reference...

Another recent thread on this forum has a further related article https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/jwst-breaks-another-redshift-record.1017252/ In particular redshift greater than 16 range and some of the filters applied. Including the absolute magnitude formula applied

A quick follow up in case others are interested. The reference 12 I linked from the article Bandersnatch provided hoes into detail on the high redshift error corrections in section 8 and also previously mentions the effect of an overdensity region at z= 8.7 roughly. Still studying the articles...

You need to calibrate for photometric redshifts is essentially what I'm after. Which Bandersnatch posted a paper with a relevant paper I can use as it also includes the specifics on the procedures used and I should be able to further backtrack through its references as well. Thanks all for the...

Sorry for not being clear, I was looking for details such as calibration for background influences such as noise reduction, relative motion with regards to spectrographic measurements etc. That being said the link supplied by Bandersnatch has a further link in reference 12 that includes the...

This article lists what needed calibrating but I haven't found which portions were in error https://www.stsci.edu/~INS/2010CalWorkshop/mather.pdf

The calibration would also entail it's motion with regards to redshift influence much like Planck calibration for dipole anistrophy. I've seen numerous pop media articles stating the error existed on previous distance measurements were due to calibration errors and am looking for better detail.

I understand that many of the extreme distance objects were incorrectly calibrated for their distance and subsequent age. I have been trying to track down the related articles detailing the error with the applicable mathematics. If anyone knows where I can get the related calibration papers it...

Interesting article thanks for sharing, the article has an interesting argument.

Not surprisingly that article misleads this detail. Wonder if this older version of Jorrie's cosmocalc still works. {\small\begin{array}{|c|c|c|c|c|c|}\hline T_{Ho} (Gy) & T_{H\infty} (Gy) & S_{eq} & H_{0} & \Omega_\Lambda & \Omega_m\\ \hline 14.4&17.3&3400&67.9&0.693&0.307\\ \hline \end{array}}...

K I never consider anything done on video as a decent reference. I always prefer strong mathematical peer reviewed articles. Just for a decent reference here is a half decent article on gravitational lensing with the applicable formulas. https://arxiv.org/abs/1604.06601 This is how it's...

Really it's been over 19 years since that paper and it's only available on research gate. Can you supply a fully peer reviewed paper showing such a study.

Having getting a chance at reading the new findings your assessment is pretty accurate. In a way these different methodologies and studied is particularly good in that one can assess the pros and cons of each study which greatly helps us remove or minimize systematic errors. I found some of...

I know Planck doesn't just rely on its own measurements but also includes other datasets in its calibration procedures. About the others I couldn't really say at this time. I will have to read these other papers after work but it's becoming obvious the jury is still out as you mentioned

Doh thank you missed that error corrected thanks again