Comparing wavelength colour to preceived things is somewhat futile because we know perceptions are quite flawed.
http://www.planetperplex.com/en/item35
Good ole optical illusions.
Or go Cheech and Chong and do a load of hallucinogens.
We know colour can be defined by wavelength and...
e=mc^2
The thing is... to do this. You would essentially need an antimatter-matter reaction.
So plutonium is more or less a unneccessary component. You could just plain hydrogen. You simply need mass. Then you need 1:1 ratio so 10 grams of matter + 10 grams of matter.
So the M is double...
Fair enough I will be on my way. I know Religion and you know facts, intelligence, knowledge don't mix obviously.
I have been trying to get Ryan to post evidence. Perhaps he does have some.
This proves you are here to proselytize and not have a debate.
Still have yet to see any "good reasons" to believe god exists. "Good reasons" aside you have no evidence.
Kalam* this suggests you aren't reading my posts.
So what causes virtual particle? You may be nominated for a nobel...
Proven just as much as gravity. Ofcoarse you can't believe in gravity according to the bible. So naturally I see the problem.
However, the great majority of scientists today
That is an appeal to popularity.
Virtual particles or nuclear decay to start. You have yet to rebuttal those.
So...
No. The universe itself can be in existence why the big bang is the beginning of matter's existence.
The big bang created the matter in the universe and not the universe itself. Which happen 13.73 billion years ago. NOT 6000 years ago like your bible states.
Time is a measurement between...
Because the theists aren't actually capable of dealing with the most fundamental fact. You really cannot discuss God without first providing evidence for the premise of God actually existing.
Except the universe can be explained without God or any creative agency as you say. E=mc^2 NOT e...
Wow I can't believe I'm even still setup for notification let alone the thread still existing. The fellows on the forum don't take kindly to religion. Religion and you know facts, intelligence, knowledge don't mix obviously.
Anyway the last time anyone even posted in this thread was March...
anything with mass has gravity. Your mass is so small that its negligible. Which is why things aren't orbiting you.
Gravity=(G * m1 * m2) / (d^2)
G= 6.67300 × 10^-11
m1=your mass in kg.
m2=mass of other thing(such as the earth) in kg.
d=distance in metres
Now bare with me :)
MS is basically the immune system attacking the nervous system.
HIV is a virus attacking the immune system.
If you contract HIV and have your immune system eliminated. Your immune system than cannot attack your nervous system.
Obviously this is a pretty barbaric way...
Alright how about this.
Alright at TIME=X we have 2 galaxies at positions P1 and P2. We pick any spot between those 2 galaxies. We park our spaceship there and come to an ALL stop. We have absolutely no movement of any kind. Might be an argument from my incredulity, but I can't see how that...
I'm confused now. I thought Hubble discovered the redshift-blueshift deal. Which had shown that there was an expansion of universe/space from a specific point aka big bang.
Has all that been disproven or something? Or am I extremely mistaken on what I'd learnt?
Wasn't the big bang at the center? I'm also pretty sure an orange has a center. Might be a silly analogy i think because I suppose it's possible that the center wouldn't really have anything at it.
Plus it doesn't have to be relative to the center. It could be relative to ANY point in the...
Well subject says it all basically... I am assuming the center of the universe is stationary.. I just want to play around with this and punch this into that einstein equation
t1/t=root (1-(v/c)^2)
To see what would be the difference in time rates for a person in a stationary(relative to...