Recent content by Pizza

Thank you for your answer. What will happen then, in the last case?

No, I meant if the screen is semi-tansparent. So, there is a barrier (non-transparent) with 2 slits (transparent), then a screen (semi-transparent) and then another screen (non-transparent). But I imagine, the picture on the last screen would be similar to the first one. Nevertheless an...

Hi, I have a little question about the double-slit experiment, if this is the right place here, the right category? When the particles/waves are hitting the wall (the screen): Is that a mesurement as well? I would say Yes, it is, but would like to here a confirmation or a correction. And...

No, I just remember that the LCDM model ist the present favorite one. But please, do not ask me what exactly these letters are representing, even if read about it. I even discussed something in German already, but still have problems. You said it: look on the math. That is what I should do, you...

Lets have a look then, if there are no loopholes in this math in question. For me actually "just" a matter of some (many) years or never. I like math, but am far beyond the necessary skills. Ahm, I mean for the math itself, to find loopholes probably likely never of course. Thanks for your...

But this is exactly what did not imply - in my thoughts - that edges are impossible, so may exist. Looking back in time would have the same appearance I imagined.

Allright then, will have to have a look on the math. I was not aware of that, that it would look differnt. Have to believe you. Are you sure? Even if it is 10000 times larger, we not sitting in the middle but somewhere far enough from any border?

Hmm, ok. But still difficult, emptiness with time, by the GR? And why not? The principles would maybe allow that observation, or the observations, leading to these principles are maybe still consistent, if the border is, let's say, 100 times farther than the observable universe!?

Thank you for your explanations. [Sorry for replying a little late - I had been overwhelmed by the latest events here in Europe eventually. My latest post here more or less a try to come back to everyday life - trying it again now] I have probably too many difficulties to grasp the concept of...

Probably I didn't read it careful enough. But I do my best and read it again. Lets say then there is no singularity (do not like it). Never was etc. That is, what I am talking about. I could imagine, that if something is zero and grows, would end in infinite. Just Imagination. Why should it end...

Okay, let's talk then about a finite thing growing to infinite. The thing was never zero big at any time. And then, wow, got infinite, Is it that, what I have to believe? How could you really make sure (and prove) that something grows to infinite?

the slices shape, form, appearance - from the outside view. A slice is like a cut from a bigger thing, like a 2d from a 3d. A slice here, like you described, is like a screenshot of a moment of time in space. Isn't it? So what's about the big bang, what's about the slices there? and how can a...

Am sorry, but the slices have to have a shape near the big bang too. And from there it should describe slices - and I wonder how they should grow from finite to infinite!?

And how should a minimalistic slice turn into an infinite?

Reading this thread was useful for me too.