Recent content by Rhi

  1. R

    Inertial/non-inertial reference frames

    Oh, right, I see what you mean now... I was thinking that it was released from rest so would have zero velocity in the x direction so wouldn't be parabolic but that's not right if you're in an inertial frame.. Thanks for all the help!
  2. R

    Inertial/non-inertial reference frames

    Hmm.. How do you get parabolic motion? sorry if I'm being slow here!
  3. R

    Inertial/non-inertial reference frames

    Ah right of course! I see what you mean now, and that gives the correct answer, thanks. The only other bit I wasn't sure about was part c), I don't really know what sort of answer they're looking for..
  4. R

    Inertial/non-inertial reference frames

    Apologies if I'm being really stupid here, but I don't see how the initial conditions give any information about v_{0} and w_{0}? The two initial conditions give you the constants from the ODE don't they?
  5. R

    Inertial/non-inertial reference frames

    I'm a bit unsure about the last couple of bits of this question, and I'm hoping someone might be able to help. Homework Statement a) Let a reference frame with origin O & Cartesian axes (x, y, z) be fixed relative to the surface of the rotating Earth at co-latitude θ (i.e. 0≤θ≤∏, where θ...
  6. R

    Poisson brackets and angular momentum

    Ah, I get it. That makes a lot of sense, cheers :)
  7. R

    Poisson brackets and angular momentum

    I'm not really sure what you mean, there's no L_k involved in the last line? And I'm not really sure what you mean by a commutator, either..
  8. R

    Poisson brackets and angular momentum

    Homework Statement Let f(q, p), g(q, p) and h(q, p) be three functions in phase space. Let Lk = εlmkqlpm be the kth component of the angular momentum. (i) Define the Poisson bracket [f, g]. (ii) Show [fg, h] = f[g, h] + [f, h]g. (iii) Find [qj , Lk], expressing your answer in terms of...
Back
Top