"Unfortunately General Relativity breaks down at this point so cannot provide a clear picture"
I have considered this position with interest over many years including the conclusion that the equations leads to a point source. Within maths, infinity whether infinitely small or large, is a...
that was interesting and you are right should not have been A. Although maybe not as that was part of the answer I was looking for. The assumption in this maths appears to indicate a bias towards an expanding universe which though interesting brings me to my next question. This does not appear...
I have looked but do not seem to be able to pin down how Hubble's Constant deals with Gravity. Is it considered as Newtonian or Einstein special theory?
There appears to be an ongoing bias towards the existence of time as a dimension. Yet clearly there is an ongoing argument within the scientific community about it's existence. What are the arguments for and against times existence, As even after extensive reading including
Einstein-Minkowski...