Do Frying Pans Weigh More in the Sun or the Shade?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ƒ(x)
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physics
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the weight and mass of frying pans under different conditions. It is established that a frying pan's mass remains constant regardless of its location, whether in a dark room or outside in sunlight. However, weight can vary slightly due to gravitational differences; a frying pan at ground level weighs more than one 500 meters above due to reduced gravity at higher altitudes. The conversation also touches on the impact of environmental factors, such as dust or pollen, on weight measurements. Additionally, the potential increase in mass due to solar energy absorption is noted, with the argument that a heated frying pan outside may have a minuscule increase in mass, thus weighing slightly more. Overall, while mass remains unchanged, weight can be influenced by external factors and gravitational variations.
ƒ(x)
Messages
327
Reaction score
0
What weighs more, a frying pan in a dark room, or one that is outside on a sunny day?

Which has more mass, a frying pan in a dark room, or one that is outside on a sunny day?

Which weighs more, a frying pan at ground level or one 500 meters above the ground?

Which has more mass, a frying pan at ground level, or one 500 meters above the ground?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe this should be in the physics section. Idk how to move posts though, or rename them...
 
they all weigh the same and have same mass.
 
Assuming they are the same frying pan, they will always have the same mass.

A frying pan 500m above the Earth will weight slightly less than a frying pan located ON Earth due to the increased distance and therefore slightly lower gravity.

A frying pan (the pan itself) weighs the same in both a dark and closed room; however, if you consider the effects of dust/pollen this may change depending on how dusty your room is! Also, the light from the sun will very very very gently push down on the frying pan, making weight measurements of it very slightly higher, but the frying pan itself doesn't weigh more.
 
Hmm...

So, the one outside will have absorbed solar energy. But, since mass and energy are directly related (E=mc2), the mass increases as well--although by a tiny amount.
 
ƒ(x) said:
What weighs more, a frying pan in a dark room, or one that is outside on a sunny day?

Sunny day. E=mc2 and energy is mass, so the hotter pan would have more mass. More mass means greater mutual gravitational attraction, therefore, more weight.

Which has more mass, a frying pan in a dark room, or one that is outside on a sunny day?

This question should have preceeded the first. The hot pan has more mass, and mass weighs more. So the sunny day.

Which weighs more, a frying pan at ground level or one 500 meters above the ground?

Ground level, as it's closer to the primary mass (Earth).

Which has more mass, a frying pan at ground level, or one 500 meters above the ground?

No difference (and there's no gravitational mass dilation as there is with time. That I know of...)

On second thought... We know time slows down and mass increases with relative velocity, so if gravitational time dilation holds, would gravitational mass increase hold as well? I'm thinking this may be the difference in Schwarzschild radii we see between rotating and non-rotating BH's, as per http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Mass_Properties.PNG" .

Ok, I'll go out on a limb - the frying pan at ground level has more mass.

Hey, I'm no brainsnot, so if you have different answers and rational justifications, I'm all ears!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Just ONCE, I wanted to see a post titled Status Update that was not a blatant, annoying spam post by a new member. So here it is. Today was a good day here in Northern Wisconsin. Fall colors are here, no mosquitos, no deer flies, and mild temperature, so my morning run was unusually nice. Only two meetings today, and both went well. The deer that was road killed just down the road two weeks ago is now fully decomposed, so no more smell. Somebody has a spike buck skull for their...
Thread 'RIP George F. Smoot III (1945-2025)'
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/George_Smoot https://physics.berkeley.edu/people/faculty/george-smoot-iii https://apc.u-paris.fr/fr/memory-george-fitzgerald-smoot-iii https://elements.lbl.gov/news/honoring-the-legacy-of-george-smoot/ https://www.nobelprize.org/prizes/physics/2006/smoot/facts/ https://www.aps.org/publications/apsnews/200611/nobel.cfm https://inspirehep.net/authors/988263 Structure in the COBE Differential Microwave Radiometer First-Year Maps (Astrophysical Journal...
Back
Top