Which Marble Bounces Higher, Steel on Steel or Steel on Glass?

  • Thread starter Thread starter buffgilville
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Collisions
AI Thread Summary
Dropping a steel marble onto a steel plate results in a higher bounce compared to dropping it onto a glass plate, as the marble tends to penetrate the glass rather than bounce. The bounce height is influenced by the elasticity of the collision, where energy losses can occur due to permanent deformation, heat conversion, or residual deformation. Analyzing non-ideal collisions, where the marbles do not collide at their centers of mass, introduces complications such as uneven energy distribution and altered trajectories. This can affect the accuracy of bounce height predictions. Overall, the material properties and collision dynamics play crucial roles in determining bounce height.
buffgilville
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
1) If you dropped a steel marble onto a steel plate and then dropped a steel marble onto a glass plate, which would you expect to bounce higher? Why?

2) Suppose that a projectile marble and target marble do not collide with their centers of mass equidistant from the floor. What problems in analyzing this experiment are caused by this non-ideal collision?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
buffgilville said:
1) If you dropped a steel marble onto a steel plate and then dropped a steel marble onto a glass plate, which would you expect to bounce higher?
The steel on steel case.

Why?
Because the marble just went right through the glass instead of bouncing.

The reality is that it depends on how elastic the collision is. Energy losses occur if there is permanent deformation, if the deformation is converted into heat, or if there's is some residual deformation that recovers after the collision.

Suprisingly to most people, a pool ball bounces really well off a hard surface.
 
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top