Problem with numerator in a series expansion
1 Attachment(s)
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known data
The problem I am having has to do with part (d) in the picture which I have attached. I have managed to get as far as to determine that the coefficients in the series expansion have the recurrence relation shown below in part (2). From this I think that I have been able to determine that the general form of the coefficients must what is shown in part (3) below. The issue is I am unsure of how to get the proper form of the numerator. Any assistance would be greatly appreciated, thanks! 2. Relevant equations [itex]a_{n+2}=\frac{n(n+3)\lambda}{R^{2}(n+2)(n+3)}[/itex] where [itex]a_{o}=1[/itex] [itex]λ=\frac{2m^{2}}{\omega_{o}^{2}}[/itex] where m is the separation constant 3. The attempt at a solution [itex]a_{2n}=\frac{something}{(R^{2})^{n}(2n+1)!}[/itex] 
Re: Problem with numerator in a series expansion
Quote:
http://www.physicsforums.com/attachm...5&d=1327929002 
Re: Problem with numerator in a series expansion
Much better, so any ideas?

Re: Problem with numerator in a series expansion
Part (d) only asks for the recurrence relation. You don't need to get a closed form for a_{n}.

Re: Problem with numerator in a series expansion
ugh now I feel dumb. Guess I should have read it most closely. Thanks though. I don't suppose you have any ideas about part (e). I realize that if r=R then the series is simply an expansion of terms that go to infinity but I am unsure of how I would truncate the series.

Re: Problem with numerator in a series expansion
You need the numerator in the recurrence relation to vanish at some point so that all the subsequent coefficients will be 0. That requirement tells you the possible values of λ.

Re: Problem with numerator in a series expansion
is there a way to determine at what specific point it should vanish?

Re: Problem with numerator in a series expansion
Nope, because you're obtaining a family of solutions. If the series terminates after one term, that's one mode of oscillation. If it terminates after two terms, that's another mode of oscillations, and so on.

Re: Problem with numerator in a series expansion
Oh ok, I will work at this and see what I can do. Thank you for your help!

All times are GMT 5. The time now is 12:51 AM. 
Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000  2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
© 2014 Physics Forums