Trig identity that I'm missing

  • Thread starter Thread starter member 392791
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around integrating -tan(x)sec^2(x) and the resulting confusion over the answers provided by Wolfram Alpha. The user initially calculated -tan^2(x) / 2, while Wolfram Alpha showed -sec(x)/2 without the step-by-step solution. It was clarified that tan^2(x) does not equal sec(x), but rather sec^2(x) = tan^2(x) + 1, explaining the difference in results. The key takeaway is that in indefinite integrals, different methods can yield answers that differ by a constant. Ultimately, the integration results are consistent within the context of trigonometric identities.
member 392791
I am trying to integrate -tan(x)sec^2(x) and getting -tan^2(x) / 2. When I put it in wolfram alpha it gets the same answer when I press show solution, but without pressing it it shows -sec(x)/2.

So I am wondering, is it the case tan^2(x) = sec(x)?? I don't remember this as a correct trig identity

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=-tan%28x%29sec^2%28x%29+integral

Notice the difference in answer when you press for the show step by step solution
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm reading (1/2)[-sec(x)]^2 + C, in which case they might've used [tan(x)]^2 = [sec(x)]^2-1
 
Ahh I was misreading it, thanks.
 
In indefinite integral can have different answers, depending on the technique that is used, but the answers can differ by at most a constant.

When you integrated -tan(x)sec2(x) you got -(1/2)tan2(x). Wolfram's answer was -(1/2)sec2(x). Since sec2(x) = tan2(x) + 1, your answer and Wolfram's answer differ by a constant.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top