Understanding Charge Formulation in Discharging RC Circuits: A Quick Question

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion regarding the formulation of charge on a capacitor during its discharge in an RC circuit. The original equation presented is -q/C - IR = 0, which raises questions about the negative signs associated with both terms. The book suggests this formulation is consistent with the charging equation, but the reasoning is unclear to the participant. They argue that the current flow direction implies a different equation, potentially leading to +q/C - IR = 0. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding voltage increases and drops in loop equations, particularly when analyzing circuits without a battery.
Ja4Coltrane
Messages
224
Reaction score
0
So, I understand the charging of an RC circuit perfectly, but I am a tiny bit bothered by one part of the formulation of charge on a capacitor plate as a function of time for a discharging capacitor in a simple RC circuit (charged with one battery, one resistor and one capacitor all in series and discharged without the battery).
What bothers me is that the original loop rule equation seems to have a negative sign that doesn't make sense. The book gives the expression
-q/C-IR=0

I don't understand why both of these should be negative, in looking at the direction that the charge would flow, it seems that the equation should be

q/C-IR=0 or IR-q/C=0

The books explanation is that the formula is the same as the one used for charging the capacitor just without the battery, but this explanation doesn't quite make sense to me. I'm probably just being stupid. Is the reason perhaps that the -IR involves a negative value for I and therefore causes a positive potential difference?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Without a diagram it's hard to know for sure. But in writing loop equations, you generally follow the standard that a voltage increase (like going from the - to the + terminal of a voltage source as you trace the loop) is a positive voltage term, and a voltage drop (like when you trace in the direction of the current flow through a battery) is a negative voltage term in the equation. Does that help with your question?
 
Last edited:
mmmm, not exactly. Here, imagine a simple circuit with no battery containing only a switch, a capacitor and a resistor in series. Consider that the capacitor is on the left of the resistor and the left plate is initialy (before the switch is closed) charged with a positive sign. The switch is then closed. It seems that the current should flow to the left (left for the resistor and capacitor). Because of this, if I do a loop rule it seems like the I would get +q/C-IR=0. Did that clear up my question?
 
see here: http://www.ac.wwu.edu/~vawter/PhysicsNet/Topics/DC-Current/RCSeries.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
I was thinking using 2 purple mattress samples, and taping them together, I do want other ideas though, the main guidelines are; Must have a volume LESS than 1600 cubic centimeters, and CAN'T exceed 25 cm in ANY direction. Must be LESS than 1 kg. NO parachutes. NO glue or Tape can touch the egg. MUST be able to take egg out in less than 1 minute. Grade A large eggs will be used.

Similar threads

Back
Top