Newton's Second Law & Moment of Inertia Derivation?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on deriving the expression for the moment of inertia using Newton's Second Law, referencing a lab experiment. Participants clarify the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration, as well as the formula for torque. There is a specific attempt to manipulate equations involving effective mass and gravitational acceleration to reach the desired expression. The necessity of calculus for understanding the problem is debated, with some suggesting it may not be essential. The physical system in question is confirmed to be identical to that used in the lab experiment.
danyalasdf
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


We did something very similar to this in lab

http://webenhanced.lbcc.edu/physte/phys2ate/2A LAB HANDOUTS/Moment of Inertia.pdf

Use Newton's Second to derive the expression for the experimentally determined moment of inertia

Homework Equations


Newton's Second Law is F=m*a

s=(1/2)*a*t^2

Experimentally Moment of Inertia

I=r^2(m((gt^2/2s)-t) - mf)

Trying to get to this ^

mf= mass effective not much meaning just mass in kg
If it confusing the gt^2 is divided by 2s then it is subtracted by t and multiplied by r^2 and then minus mf

Torque= F*r= m*r*a

T= (mf + m)(g - a) = tension

The Attempt at a Solution



T= (mf + m)(g - (2*s/t^2))

T= (mf + m)((1/2)(a*t^2) - a)

T= (mf + m)(a((1/2)*t^2 - 1)

I am stuck write here
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Is calculus is a prerequisite for this course?
 
Pythagorean said:
Is calculus is a prerequisite for this course?

yes it is Physics Calculus Based 2211K
 
Calc may not be necessary.

So what's the physical system you're doing in this problem? Is it the same exact system as in the lab?
 
Pythagorean said:
Calc may not be necessary.

So what's the physical system you're doing in this problem? Is it the same exact system as in the lab?

yes it is the exact same system
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top