Show Commutativity of Group with All Elements of Order 2 & Consider Zn

  • Thread starter Thread starter halvizo1031
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups
halvizo1031
Messages
77
Reaction score
0
I need help here: Suppose that G is a group in which every non-identity element has order two. Show that G is commutative.


Also, Consider Zn = {0,1,...,n-1}
a. show that an element k is a generator of Zn if and only if k and n are relatively prime.

b. Is every subgroup of Zn cyclic? If so, give a proof. If not, provide an example.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What does it mean that G is commutative?
What possible ways to prove commutativity do you know of?

For the second one, I suggest starting with the "<==" implication (i.e. assume that k and n are relatively prime and show that k generates Zn.
 
CompuChip said:
What does it mean that G is commutative?
What possible ways to prove commutativity do you know of?

For the second one, I suggest starting with the "<==" implication (i.e. assume that k and n are relatively prime and show that k generates Zn.



for the first one, we can show commutativity with a multiplication table. How else?

for the second one, i want to start with ==> and say that the order of k is n/(m,n). but how can i show it?
 
OK let's take them one at a time.

The definition of commutativity is that xy = yx for any two elements x and y.
Can you explicitly show this in the case given?
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Back
Top