Finding the Angle and Speed in a Game of Pool

  • Thread starter Thread starter VitaX
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Game Momentum
AI Thread Summary
In a pool game, the cue ball strikes another ball at rest, resulting in the cue ball moving at 3.10 m/s at a 27.0° angle, while the second ball moves at 2.30 m/s. The discussion emphasizes using conservation of momentum to solve for the angle between the second ball's direction and the cue ball's original path, as well as the cue ball's initial speed. Participants suggest breaking down the momentum into x and y components and highlight the importance of correctly assigning positive and negative angles based on the direction of motion. The conversation also notes that mass cancels out in the equations, simplifying the calculations. Understanding how to set up the equations and utilize angles is crucial for solving similar problems in the future.
VitaX
Messages
183
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In a game of pool, the cue ball strikes another ball of the same mass and initially at rest. After the collision, the cue ball moves at 3.10 m/s along a line making an angle of 27.0° with its original direction of motion, and the second ball has a speed of 2.30 m/s. Find (a) the angle between the direction of motion of the second ball and the original direction of motion of the cue ball and (b) the original speed of the cue ball.

Homework Equations



Conservation of Momentum

The Attempt at a Solution



Not sure how to solve this at all. Only thing I am sure of is my drawing. What steps do I use to go about finding the angle?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi VitaX! :smile:

Call the angle θ, do x and y components of momentum (separately), and solve. :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi VitaX! :smile:

Call the angle θ, do x and y components of momentum (separately), and solve. :wink:

My teacher told me this through an email:

m v1i cos 0 + m(0) = m (3.1) cos 27 + m (2.3) cos (theta 2) ... (1)

m v1i sin 0 + m(0) = m (3.1) sin 27 - m (2.3) sin (theta 2) ... (2)

I see that here mass is irrelevant so it all cancels out. Why in the 2nd equation is it minus 2.3m*sin(theta) instead of plus? Is it just to make sure the angle I get comes out to be positive instead of negative?
 
Last edited:
Hi VitaX! :smile:

(what happened to that θ i gave you? :confused:)
VitaX said:
Why in the 2nd equation is it minus 2.3m*sin(theta) instead of plus? Is it just to make sure the angle I get comes out to be positive instead of negative?

ah, I expect you drew the diagram logically, and measured both angles anti-clockwise from the right, as usual …

that makes one angle positive, and the other (θ2) negative.

But usuallly we draw the diagram realistically, with the the balls (or whatever) going the way we expect, ie one ball goes to the left, so the other must go to the right, so we draw it that way …

that of course makes θ2 positive (which, as you suggested, is the purpose)! :wink:

It really makes no difference … if you substitute -θ2 for θ2 in the equation, you get the same actual results. :smile:

(btw, what did you not see before the teacher emailed you? would you be able to do a similar problem in future, or is there still something worrying you about it?)​
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi VitaX! :smile:

(what happened to that θ i gave you? :confused:)


ah, I expect you drew the diagram logically, and measured both angles anti-clockwise from the right, as usual …

that makes one angle positive, and the other (θ2) negative.

But usuallly we draw the diagram realistically, with the the balls (or whatever) going the way we expect, ie one ball goes to the left, so the other must go to the right, so we draw it that way …

that of course makes θ2 positive (which, as you suggested, is the purpose)! :wink:

It really makes no difference … if you substitute -θ2 for θ2 in the equation, you get the same actual results. :smile:

(btw, what did you not see before the teacher emailed you? would you be able to do a similar problem in future, or is there still something worrying you about it?)​


I knew it was conservation of momentum. But I would not have known that you have to write the components for x and y utilizing the angles given. That was where I was confused. I suspect that the angle is 0 at the initial because that's the path the ball is taking up until it hits the ball at rest.
 
VitaX said:
I knew it was conservation of momentum. But I would not have known that you have to write the components for x and y utilizing the angles given. That was where I was confused. I suspect that the angle is 0 at the initial because that's the path the ball is taking up until it hits the ball at rest.

Yes: general rule …

give unknown things (like angle or velocity) letters such as θ or v, and just plough ahead, writing all the equations.

Often it's messy, and you have two or more equations that you have to solve simultaneously, and you can't see where you're going until you get there! :redface:

But you can always help by choosing your original direction so as to make the equations simpler … in this case by choosing (and it is a choice, it's not compulsory!) 0 angle as the initial direction of the cue ball. :wink:
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top