Maximum velocity at the lowest point

helpinghand
Messages
39
Reaction score
0
Say that there is a car on a top of the hill and it was on a frictionless surface, explain why the maximum speed of the car would occur at the lowest point of the hill?

In this case would you prove it through the conservstion of energy PE + KE = PE + KE?

If so, how does this prove that Vmax occurs at the lowest point?

Any help would be great, Thanks :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What can you say about PE at the top vs at the bottom? Which is higher?
 
Assume that there is no PE at the top of the hill...

What do you mean which is higher?
 
helpinghand said:
Assume that there is no PE at the top of the hill...

What do you mean which is higher?


PE is a relative phenomenon. U can't say that there is no PE at the top.
if there is no PE at the top...PE at the bottom should be negative
 
viplav said:
PE is a relative phenomenon. U can't say that there is no PE at the top.
if there is no PE at the top...PE at the bottom should be negative

Oops... typo, PE = mgh and KE = 0
 
hi friend

Assume that height of the hill is 'h' m.

now initially as the car is rest on the top of the hill...KE is zero and PE is 'mgh'

when the car is at the bottom of the hill the total PE at the top should be KE at the bottom...since PE at the bottom is zero

At any point in between top and bottom...the total energy is the sum of both PE and KE...but at the bottom the total energy is only KE so v is max at this point
 
Hi, I had an exam and I completely messed up a problem. Especially one part which was necessary for the rest of the problem. Basically, I have a wormhole metric: $$(ds)^2 = -(dt)^2 + (dr)^2 + (r^2 + b^2)( (d\theta)^2 + sin^2 \theta (d\phi)^2 )$$ Where ##b=1## with an orbit only in the equatorial plane. We also know from the question that the orbit must satisfy this relationship: $$\varepsilon = \frac{1}{2} (\frac{dr}{d\tau})^2 + V_{eff}(r)$$ Ultimately, I was tasked to find the initial...
The value of H equals ## 10^{3}## in natural units, According to : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_units, ## t \sim 10^{-21} sec = 10^{21} Hz ##, and since ## \text{GeV} \sim 10^{24} \text{Hz } ##, ## GeV \sim 10^{24} \times 10^{-21} = 10^3 ## in natural units. So is this conversion correct? Also in the above formula, can I convert H to that natural units , since it’s a constant, while keeping k in Hz ?
Back
Top