China made swiss watches before the swiss

  • Thread starter Thread starter Emreth
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    China
AI Thread Summary
A century-old Swiss watch was discovered in an ancient tomb sealed for 400 years, prompting discussions about the implications of Swiss watchmaking and historical accuracy. Participants humorously speculated on the watch's origins, suggesting scenarios involving treasure hunters and Monopoly pieces. An expert pointed out that watches did not exist during the Ming Dynasty, highlighting the anachronism. The conversation also touched on the evolution of watchmaking, noting that a Chinese company, Seagull, produces a significant portion of the world's mechanical watches, reflecting on the global dynamics of the industry. Additionally, there was criticism of the source of the information, with some participants questioning the credibility of the Daily Mail and its relevance in serious discussions. Overall, the thread combined humor with insights into the history and current state of watchmaking.
Physics news on Phys.org
Probably just a cheap knockoff
 
Ahh A tomb raider lost there watch.. Which of course means that some one got there before them..
 
You guys have it all wrong. 400 years ago, this was a Monopoly piece. People liked the shoe and the car better, so this was discontinued. Plus, the mongols couldn't eat it or use it to kill enemies, so the market was also lost.
 
wow and it's so minature,

"Watches were not around at the time of the Ming Dynasty and Switzerland did not even exist as a country, an expert pointed out."

ah ha ha


Watch making used to be representation of technological abilities of a state. A Chinese state owned company (seagull) bought mechanical watch machining equipment from Russia back around 1950, and now produces 1/4 of the worlds mechanical watches. A typical Chinese business model...I own a Seagull watch, wouldn't able to afford a Swiss or Japanese one.
 
Spourk said:
You guys have it all wrong. 400 years ago, this was a Monopoly piece. People liked the shoe and the car better, so this was discontinued.

:smile:
 
The OP cites the DailyMail, which is one of the most looked-down-upon websites in the world in terms of credibility. It is a laughing stock even among teenagers in the UK. IMHO, it should be proscribed from any respectable forum, and should certainly never be allowed in PF.

Respectfully submitted,
Steve
 
Give the members of PF more credit than that. It's posted for a laugh, that much is clear. Seems your suggesting funny posts that reference other websites should not be allowed.
 
Back
Top