Can You Solve x*log(x) = 0.1*x^2 Using Logarithmic Properties?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mycrafish
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Figure Logarithm
AI Thread Summary
The equation x*log(x) = 0.1*x^2 can be approached using logarithmic properties and the Lambert W function. First, it is important to note that x=0 is not a valid solution due to the undefined log(0). By dividing both sides by x, the equation simplifies to log(x) = 0.1x, which can be rewritten as x = e^(0.1x). This leads to the transformation involving the Lambert W function, yielding the solution x = -10W(-0.1), approximately equal to 1.11833. The Lambert W function serves as the key tool for solving this equation effectively.
mycrafish
x*log(x)=0.1*x^2
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My guess is that using Newton's Method would be the easiest. I don't see any easy way to isolate x in that equation.
 
mycrafish said:
x*log(x)=0.1*x^2
Is log = log10? Then I'd guess about, oh, let's see, ... 10? :smile:
 
First, of course, x= 0 is not a solution because log(0) is not defined. So you can divide both sides by x to get log(x)= 0.1 x. You can now write this as x= e^{0.1x}. If you let y= -0.1x, that becomes -y/0.1= e^{-y}. Now multiply on both sides by -0.1e^y to get ye^y= -0.1.

Now we can take the Lambert W function of both sides:
y= -0.1x= W(-0.1) so x= -10W(-0.1)= -10(-0.111833)= 1.11833 (to six significant figures).

(The Lambert W function is defined as the inverse function to f(x)= xe^x. It is also known as the "ProductLog" function. Mathematica evaluates that function and it can be evaluated at http://functions.wolfram.com/webMathematica/FunctionEvaluation.jsp?name=ProductLog. That's what I used to get the value above.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top