Can the choice of codomain affect the surjectivity of a function?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dijkarte
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
AI Thread Summary
The choice of codomain significantly impacts the surjectivity of a function. For example, the function f(x) = exp(x) is not surjective when defined from R to R, but becomes bijective when the codomain is set to (0, inf). The codomain essentially determines surjectivity; if it matches the range of the function, the function is surjective. Additionally, one can adjust the codomain to ensure surjectivity, while the same does not apply universally to injectivity. Ultimately, the specification of the codomain can be flexible as long as the range remains a subset of it.
dijkarte
Messages
190
Reaction score
0
Given a function f(x) f:A --> B, can the choice of codomain affect whether or not the function is surjective? For instance, f(x) = exp(x), f:R --> R is an injection but not surjection. However, assuming we can vary the co-domain, and let's make it f: R --> (0, inf), f(x) is now bijection. Is this correct?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes. The codomain pretty much determines by itself whether or not the function is surjective.
 
Got it. Thanks.
 
dijkarte said:
Got it. Thanks.

I should probably qualify my previous post. The codomain determines surjectivity in the sense that if you define the codomain to be the same as the range of the function, then your function becomes surjective. In fact, given any function, you can restrict the codomain in such a way as to make the function surjective (you can also restrict the domain in such a way to make it injective). A different function with the same codomain obviously may not be surjective.
 
But there's no rule which restricts the specification of the codomain based on the mapping rule itself as long as the range is a subset of the codomain. For instance, f(x) = sin(x) can be specified as:

f: R --> R
f: R --> [-2, 2)
f: R --> [-1, 1]

but not as f: R --> [0, 4]
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top