Which equation would you tattoo in your body?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Casco
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Body Tattoo
AI Thread Summary
Participants in the discussion share their thoughts on which mathematical equations they would consider for a tattoo, emphasizing personal significance and aesthetic appeal. One user suggests the prime number formula relating to π, highlighting the beauty of unexpected connections in mathematics. Others mention simpler, more recognizable equations like the quadratic formula and Euler's identity, expressing a preference for meaningful or visually intricate designs. There is a consensus that any chosen equation should be well understood to facilitate explanation. Overall, the conversation revolves around the intersection of personal meaning and mathematical beauty in the context of tattoos.
Casco
Messages
82
Reaction score
1
Write your equation and a reason why would you tattoo it in your body.

Not necessarily means that you are going to do it. This is just an imaginary situation. Please just write a comment answering the question above, if do not, just do not write other kind of commentaries. I do not want this to become a discussion about if you would do or do not do a tattoo of equations.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


None. And if I did get a tattoo, it wouldn't be an equation, cause I'd think people would think I'm trying too hard to look smart. And it would be pretty awkward when they find out that I'm not smart.
 


I had better be one that you understand quite well, so you can explain it without trouble. (Just a suggestion.) And it should be concise. Not a great idea to have Einstein's Field equations tattooed on your back, unless you trust the artist not to screw up the notation...
 


turbo said:
I had better be one that you understand quite well, so you can explain it without trouble. (Just a suggestion.) And it should be concise. Not a great idea to have Einstein's Field equations tattooed on your back, unless you trust the artist not to screw up the notation...

leroyjenkens said:
None. And if I did get a tattoo, it wouldn't be an equation, cause I'd think people would think I'm trying too hard to look smart. And it would be pretty awkward when they find out that I'm not smart.

I changed the post, please read it again. I am sorry that I did not specify.
 
Not that I would ever do it (sorry to the OP :smile: ),but if I would then it would be

\sum_{p~\text{prime}}\frac{1}{1-p^{-2}} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}

This my favorite math formula because it relates two (apparent) complete distinct fields of mathematics.

On the left, we have the prime numbers. They have to do with number theory and arithmetic.
On the left, we have \pi which comes from geometry.

There is nothing which suggests why these two could be related. But they are! These deep and surprising connection on math is what makes it such a beautiful field to study.
 
I think you mean:
\prod_{p-prime}\frac{1}{1-p^{-2}} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}
 
phyzguy said:
I think you mean:
\prod_{p-prime}\frac{1}{1-p^{-2}} = \frac{\pi^2}{6}

Of course I did :redface: Imagine me getting a tattoo of the sum version...
 


Casco said:
I changed the post, please read it again. I am sorry that I did not specify.

Ok, I should have known that's what you meant.

On one hand, I would want a cool looking one, but on the other hand, I would want something that means a lot to me.
The quadratic formula and the pathagorean formula are the simplest ones that have been most useful to me, so I would probably get either one of those.
Or I would get that one formula which includes e, pi, and i, which is pretty cool.
 


leroyjenkens said:
Or I would get that one formula which includes e, pi, and i, which is pretty cool.

ei π = -1

I've always liked that one.

The fundamental theorem of calculus might be cool.

I'll think about it more, not that I'd ever get a math tattoo though. I'd almost be inclined to pick one that looks intricate / pretty rather than one of the famous equations like Euler.
 
  • #10
  • #11
My avatar
 
  • #12
\nabla \cdot \vec{B}=\rho_{0}

This would be nice, even if it is not true.
 
  • #13
<<- i is not real ->>
Meaning Re(i) = 0.
 
  • #14
Not the tattoo type, but perhaps:
C_{m_{\alpha}} = -C_{l_{\alpha}}\left(\bar{x}_{AC}-\bar{x}_{CG}\right)
or
\frac{^\mathcal{N}\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\mathbf{r} = \frac{^\mathcal{B}\mathrm{d}}{\mathrm{d}t}\mathbf{r} + \boldsymbol{\omega}_{\mathcal{B}/\mathcal{N}} \times \mathbf{r}
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Back
Top