What is the relationship between torque and angular momentum in a rigid body?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between torque and angular momentum in rigid bodies, emphasizing the equations that define this relationship. It highlights that external torque is equal to the rate of change of angular momentum, both for stationary and accelerating points. The equations presented show how angular momentum can be expressed relative to different points, including the center of mass and any accelerating point. A specific query is raised regarding the equation for external torque at an accelerating point and its components. Clarification on the variables involved is requested to facilitate better understanding and responses.
naestibill
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Considering a Rigid Body/Angular Momentum/Torque

We know that Torque(ext) = dL/dt

Now with respect to stationary point S:
L(s, cm) = Ʃ(ρi x mivi)
and that dL(cm)/dt = Ʃτ(ext, CM)

Now with respect to ANY point, P, that is accelerating:
L(s,p) = L(cm) + ρ(cm) x Mv(cm)
And hence,
Ʃτ(ext, p) = dL(rel_p)/dt + ρ(cm) x Ma(p)
Ʃτ(ext, p) = dL(rel_cm)/dt + ρ(cm) x Ma(cm)

Can someone explain to me why this happens?:
Why this happens? : Ʃτ(ext, p) = dL(rel_p)/dt + ρ(cm) x Ma(p)

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you would take the trouble to describe all your variables you've a better chance of a response.
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top