Schools Grad School Reputation: Impact of Rankings & State Schools

AI Thread Summary
When applying to graduate schools, many prospective students prioritize rankings, but the presence of strong research groups in specific areas often holds greater importance. For those aiming for academic careers, the reputation of the institution can significantly impact opportunities, as top-ranked schools frequently house leading research groups. Notably, many faculty members at prestigious universities come from elite institutions, raising questions about the underrepresentation of highly regarded state schools like the University of Colorado at Boulder and the University of Michigan in faculty positions at top schools. This may be due to their relatively recent emergence as leaders in fields like AMO physics, which limits their ability to produce a network of influential alumni. Additionally, perceptions of state schools can vary, with some individuals expressing skepticism despite the high rankings of certain institutions. Ultimately, the consensus suggests that strong advisors and research opportunities are critical factors in the graduate school selection process.
bardeen
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hello everyone,

I have been a reader of this forum for quite some time and so I've read plenty on this topic. I have a question though...

When applying to graduate schools most people first think about rankings (and then all other factors come in - research specialities, location, atmosphere, etc.). A lot of people give the advice that more important than rankings is whether there is a strong research group in your area of interest or not. This makes sense. However, if your dream is to work in the academia, it seems like school name (ranking) does make a BIG difference. You could say "well, the thing is that the strongest research groups for every area of physics are located in the best-ranked schools". Again this seems logical. But if you go to the physics deparment websites for the top schools you'll see that almost all professors come from big name schools (Harvard, MIT, Princeton, etc.). Google "physics grad school rankings AMO" and click on the first link (I can't post a link because I haven't reached 10 posts).
Why is it that University of Colorado at Boulder, University of Michigan, Kansas State University, and University of Central Florida are so underrepresented in the faculty of top schools if they are ranked as some of the best for AMO?

On a related note: Why is it that people tend to speak of state schools with some sort of degrading? Not exactly degrading but they don't seem to be given much love. Why is this the case? There are some state schools that are very highly ranked. I am not from the USA so I don't know if there is something I don't know about them.

Thanks in advance for any input :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Someone?
 
Well how long have those schools (Boulder, Florida, etc) been among the best for AMO? Maybe they haven't been at the top for long enough to seed professors to schools. I feel like I know a few professors at top schools who aren't from "name" schools, and usually I find out that their advisors were very strong. That's usually what it comes down to - and highly ranked/prestigious places tend to have a high density of strong advisors to work with. In the end I think most of my friends and I when applying to grad schools were primarily interested in applying to places with a lot of strong professors.

I also don't see the disdain for state schools. I went to a highly-ranked state school and got a lot of respect for it.
 
guys i am currently studying in computer science engineering [1st yr]. i was intrested in physics when i was in high school. due to some circumstances i chose computer science engineering degree. so i want to incoporate computer science engineering with physics and i came across computational physics. i am intrested studying it but i dont know where to start. can you guys reccomend me some yt channels or some free courses or some other way to learn the computational physics.
I'm going to make this one quick since I have little time. Background: Throughout my life I have always done good in Math. I almost always received 90%+, and received easily upwards of 95% when I took normal-level HS Math courses. When I took Grade 9 "De-Streamed" Math (All students must take "De-Streamed" in Canada), I initially had 98% until I got very sick and my mark had dropped to 95%. The Physics teachers and Math teachers talked about me as if I were some sort of genius. Then, an...
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Back
Top