Zero voltage, non-zero current?

AI Thread Summary
When a solar panel is short-circuited, it generates current without voltage, resulting in no external power delivery due to the lack of an external load. The current measured by an ammeter is influenced by the internal resistance of the device, which allows for a negligible voltage to be present, enabling current measurement. In the case of a capacitor, while it can draw significant current initially, it does not dissipate power as it only stores energy. The internal resistance of all devices means that power can be dissipated internally when short-circuited, which can lead to destructive outcomes. Therefore, while current exists in these scenarios, the effective power output remains minimal unless an appropriate load is applied.
Artlav
Messages
161
Reaction score
1
Reading about solar panels i came across a peculiar description - "When the panel is short circuited, there is current but no voltage, so no power is being generated."

How does that work?
What does the current represent in that case, and what moves the needle of an ammeter?


Another instance of the same problem happens when charging a big capacitor.
At first, there is essentially no voltage across it, but several dozens of amperes of current is going into it. Once again power, 0*I, is about zero, and yet the power is being consumed into the capacitor.

What am i missing here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When the solar cell is shorted, there is no external load and so no place external to the cell for there to be an IR drop. Hence, no power is externally delivered. Now in the case of an ammeter, an ideal ammeter is a device that draws no voltage (i.e. suffers no IR drop) but yet (somehow) measures current. In practice, a real ammeter draws "negligible" voltage and uses that negligible voltage to sense current. And so, a solar cell actually delivers power, albeit "negligible", to a real ammeter.

Thank about your capacitor question again. From a circuits perspective, no current flows "through" an ideal capacitor; it merely stores energy but can never dissipate power. Furthermore, it is the current that may changed instantaneously, but not the voltage.
 
Reading about solar panels i came across a peculiar description - "When the panel is short circuited, there is current but no voltage, so no power is being generated."

There is a voltage and there is current and power dissipated. Just not much of it is being generated external to the device. None if you have a perfect conductor.


All devices no matter how good have internal resistance(and inductance and capacitance)

So when you place a short circuit across the output of your solar panels (or capacitors or battery etc) the voltage is developed across the internal components and the power is dissipated there.

Of course this is why placing a short circuit across any power source can be quite destructive. The internal resistance is usually designed to be as low as possible. A lot of power could be dissipated, resulting in sometimes violent reactions.

What does the current represent in that case, and what moves the needle of an ammeter?

An ammeter does not represent a short circuit. It has an internal calibrated resistance. often in the form of a thick piece of copper.

Placing an ammeter across the pv panels or capacitor does provide a load and power is dissipated within the ammeter. Just not very much. In the case of a moving needle ammeter very little power is required to move the needle full scale, so the load is very small. In a digital ammeter the load is even smaller as they are much more sensitive.
 
I was using the Smith chart to determine the input impedance of a transmission line that has a reflection from the load. One can do this if one knows the characteristic impedance Zo, the degree of mismatch of the load ZL and the length of the transmission line in wavelengths. However, my question is: Consider the input impedance of a wave which appears back at the source after reflection from the load and has traveled for some fraction of a wavelength. The impedance of this wave as it...
Back
Top