What is the energy density of a linear dielectric and why is it confusing?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the confusion surrounding the energy density of a linear dielectric, expressed as u=1/2 D·E. The author struggles with the implications of introducing free charge into the dielectric and how it affects potential energy during the system's readjustment. They question the validity of using the formula for incremental energy changes, arguing that the changes in D·E during readjustment are not accounted for. Additionally, they raise concerns about why the potential energy change due to the alteration of the electric potential is not included in the energy calculations. The conversation highlights the complexities of energy conservation in dynamic systems involving dielectrics.
dEdt
Messages
286
Reaction score
2
I've examined and re-examined the proof that the energy density of a linear dielectric is u=\frac{1}{2}\mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E}, but I still don't understand it. I'll rewrite it here and try to explain what I'm having trouble grasping.

We first imagine that the free charge (as a function of position) changes by an amount \delta \rho_{\mathrm{free}}(\mathbf{x}). The change in the potential energy \delta U is then
\int \delta\rho_{\mathrm{free}}(\mathbf{x})V(\mathbf{x})\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x}.
This can be rewritten as
\int\nabla\cdot(\delta \mathbf{D}(\mathbf{x}))V(\mathbf{x})\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x}=\int \nabla\cdot(\delta \mathbf{D} \ V)\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x} + \int \delta \mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E}\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x}.
The first term vanished because we're integrating over all of space. Also, if the dielectric is linear we have that \delta \mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E} =\frac{1}{2}\delta(\mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E}). Hence
\delta U = \frac{1}{2} \int \delta(\mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E})\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x} \rightarrow U=\frac{1}{2}\int \mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E}\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x},
proving the desired result.

My problem is with step 1. I'm imagining that time is frozen, and that we come along and sprinkle a little bit of free charge in the dielectric, like dust. Then potential energy changes by the amount \int \frac{1}{2} \delta (\mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E})\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x}. So far so good. But if we start time up again, the whole system is going to change as the polarization and bound charges adjust to the introduction of this new free charge.

"But that's not a problem," you say. "During this readjustment, energy is still conserved, so the change in \delta U is still given by that formula."

Fine, but here's the issue: after this readjustment, the change in \mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E} is not the \delta(\mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E}) that appears in the formula above. Why? Because during the readjustment, \mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E} changes as well. That means that as we incrementally add free charge, we cannot conclude that the incremental change in energy is \int \frac{1}{2} \Delta (\mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E})\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x} (where \Delta (\mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E}) is the actual change in D dot E), because we haven't taken into account that \mathbf{D}\cdot\mathbf{E} changes from readjustment.

Also, if we want to calculate the change in energy when free charge is added, why don't we take into account the change in energy from the fact that the potential changes ie why don't we include a term like \delta U = \int \rho \delta V\mathrm{d}^3 \mathbf{x}?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anyone?
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top