Viscoelastic Models: Analyzing Relaxation & Creep Data

  • Thread starter Thread starter La82
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Models
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on analyzing relaxation and creep data for a solid polymer using the Prony series derived from the generalized Maxwell equation. The user, Lonnie, questions whether the same model used for relaxation should be applied to creep data or if a generalized Kelvin Voigt model would be more appropriate. It is noted that the constitutive model should be independent of specific deformation, provided that small deformations are being analyzed. The validity of applying the Prony series to creep data is affirmed, as long as the time scales for the deformations are similar and the deformations remain small. Additionally, the importance of using shear data, such as dynamic mechanical analysis (DMA), is highlighted to further validate the model.
La82
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi everyone,

So I have a set of relaxation data and creep data for a solid polymer that I want to analyse. In the relaxation I use the Prony series derived from the generalized maxwell equation (incl a spring) and get a very nice fit. My question is if I should use the same to model the creep? Or should I use the generalized Kelvin Voigt?

I have applied the prony series to the creep data and can get a good fit, but I am a bit confused as to the validity of using this model on creep data.

Hope someone can help me with this,

Lonnie
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
The constitutive model is supposed to be independent of the specific deformation. I assume you are using a linear model valid for small deformations. Make sure that the deformations are small. The relaxation data is in shear? Any DMA shear data? That should help test the model to.

Getting back to your original question, if the time scales for the deformations are the same and the deformations are small, then the model fit to the relaxation data should also apply to the creep data.
 
Back
Top