Table-top Fusion: Read Here for Latest Nature

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZapperZ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fusion
AI Thread Summary
This week's Nature discusses a new study reporting low-level nuclear fusion achieved using a pyroelectric material, although the article contains a misspelling of "pyroelectric." There is confusion regarding whether the material was heated to achieve the fusion, as this contradicts the claim of room temperature operation. The potential applications for this technology include spacecraft thrusters, medical treatments, and as a neutron source, despite its current inefficiency for electricity generation. The study highlights the use of a low accelerating potential of about 1 kV, which limits the energy yield but also reduces energy input. Overall, the research presents intriguing possibilities for future applications in various fields.
Engineering news on Phys.org
The article mispels "pyroelectric" as "pryoelectric". :biggrin:

It does seem they obtained fusion reactions, although at a very low level.

What is strange is the claim of using a pyroelectric material at room temperature, when the article also states "This material is pryoelectric, which means that positive and negative charges build up on opposite faces of the crystal when it is heated." So did they heat it or not? If they heated it, it's not exactly room temperature. :rolleyes:

UCLA's site - http://rodan.physics.ucla.edu/pyrofusion/
 
Room temperature relative to what is usually thought of when one hears "fusion". The heat flow seems to be incident from one side only.
 
why? why? why?

Wow! more neutrons! Ionizing one's, too. What Neandertal 'modern' means of energy transformation will be utilized to make 'electricity?'. or What? another terrorist device.
What happens to the immediate surroundings when these neutrons 'pollute' change deleteriously everything close by., 'researchers' inclusive.
perhaps a better pursuit would be to maybe ask "how many BTU's are contained in water vapor in the Atmosphere assuming that the atmosphere is 100 mi thick and all other elements within the atmosphere would extend only 1500 feet above the surface?"

refugee from the nuclear industry...
 
There is a writeup in the NY Times (Aarrggghhh!).

Potential uses (in answer to Why? Why? Why?):
While the device is probably too inefficient to produce electricity or other forms of energy, the scientists say, egg-size fusion generators could someday find uses in spacecraft thrusters, medical treatments and scanners that search for bombs.
And inexpesive neutron source.

Also, about have the reactions should produce T+p. Hmmm.

From the journalist:
In a surprising feat of miniaturization, scientists are reporting today that they have produced nuclear fusion - the same process that powers the sun
Well, not exactly. Yes the sun (and stars in general) use fusion to produce energy, but the sun is primarily p+p fusion with about 2% from the CNO cycle.

I posted a copy of the article with schematic at E-S: http://www.everything-science.com/components/com_smf/index.php?topic=6060.msg55160#msg55160

The cell uses an accelerating potential of about 1 kV, hence the low yield. The yield could be boosted using a tritiated target (with concommitant radiological issues) and a higher potential. However, the low potential means low energy input.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hello, I'm currently trying to compare theoretical results with an MCNP simulation. I'm using two discrete sets of data, intensity (probability) and linear attenuation coefficient, both functions of energy, to produce an attenuated energy spectrum after x-rays have passed through a thin layer of lead. I've been running through the calculations and I'm getting a higher average attenuated energy (~74 keV) than initial average energy (~33 keV). My guess is I'm doing something wrong somewhere...
Back
Top