Is Work Being Done? Investigating Positive and Negative Work in Various Agents

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on whether work is being done by various agents and the nature of that work. For a chicken scratching the ground, it concludes that no work is done since there is no net change in energy despite the motion of its legs. In the case of a student studying, it is noted that although forces act on the student, there is no movement or energy change, resulting in no work done. The question about a person sitting down raises the concept of non-conservative forces like friction, which can convert mechanical energy into heat, indicating that work may be done in this scenario. Understanding the distinction between conservative and non-conservative forces is essential for accurately assessing work in these contexts.
Faira
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello!
I need a help with one question:

Discuss weather any work is being done by each of the following agents, and if so, wether the work is positive of negative.
a) a chiken scratching the ground (what I think is that work is performed as
W=F∆x, and if the chicken moves her leg back and forth making ∆x equal to zero it means that there is no work done)
b) a person studying (the student does not move and does not have have any force it means that he does not make any work)
c) the leg muscles of a person in the act of sitting down (here I have not clue how to answer it)
Am I on the right way? And how to answer on the last question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
THink of work in this manner:

Work is done if a force is used to change the energy state of an object (either self or other). This could be a change in kinetic energy, gravitational potential energy, or elastic potential energy. (work can change thermal energy too, but save that for later). If the force causes the thing to have more energy (speeding up, for example), positive work has been done. IF the force causes the thing to have less energy, negative work has been done.

In a): think of the chicken scratching as a repeating process; over time (half an hour of scratching for example) has anything changed in energy? Is anything going faster or slower? Is anything higher or lower? No. This agrees with your asessment that no work is done. (Unless we are including tiny dust particles kicked up with each scratch, but I don't think so).

b) There is a force on the student, but you correctly note that the student does not move (the net force on the student is zero, but lots of forces are on the student). No change in energy, no work.

c)what happens to the energy of the person who sits down?
 
What the first one is asking you indirectly is whether friction is a conservative force. is it?
 
Friction is a non-conservative force because it can convert mechanical energy such as kinetic energy into non-mechanical energy (heat).
 
A more precise statement would be

\oint F\cdot{ds} = 0
 
Faira:

has the term "conservative force" or "non conservative force" come up at all in your text or in class? This is kind of important to know in order to give you the right "level" of help.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'A bead-mass oscillatory system problem'
I can't figure out how to find the velocity of the particle at 37 degrees. Basically the bead moves with velocity towards right let's call it v1. The particle moves with some velocity v2. In frame of the bead, the particle is performing circular motion. So v of particle wrt bead would be perpendicular to the string. But how would I find the velocity of particle in ground frame? I tried using vectors to figure it out and the angle is coming out to be extremely long. One equation is by work...
Back
Top