Thread Closed

Geodesic Deviation

 
Share Thread
Jan24-04, 04:05 AM   #1
 

Geodesic Deviation


Can someone take a look at

http://wps.aw.com/wps/media/objects/...ments/Ch21.pdf

and tell me how they go from Eq. (7) to Eq. (8)? I've tried this and keep getting additional terms.
PhysOrg.com science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Leading 3-D printer firms to merge in $403M deal (Update)
>> LA to give every student an iPad; $30M order
>> CIA faulted for choosing Amazon over IBM on cloud contract
Jan24-04, 11:19 AM   #2
 
Originally posted by Arcon
Can someone take a look at

http://wps.aw.com/wps/media/objects/...ments/Ch21.pdf

and tell me how they go from Eq. (7) to Eq. (8)? I've tried this and keep getting additional terms.
i took a look at it, and did the calculation. i thought it was pretty straightforward. where did you get stuck? what extra terms do you have?

remember that x is a geodesic. so there is a geodesic equation in x, and it therefore vanishes. and remember that χ is very small; drop any term with more than one χ in it.
Jan24-04, 11:24 AM   #3
 
Originally posted by lethe
i took a look at it, and did the calculation. i thought it was pretty straightforward. where did you get stuck? what extra terms do you have?

remember that x is a geodesic. so there is a geodesic equation in x, and it therefore vanishes. and remember that χ is very small; drop any term with more than one χ in it.
I fingered it out [:)]

One has to drop not only the term &chi*&chi but the term which is the product of &chi and a derivative of &chi. That was what I was missing.
Jan24-04, 11:59 AM   #4
 

Geodesic Deviation


Thank you

I believe that I've fingered it out [:)]

One has to drop not only the term χ*χ but the term which is the product of χ and a derivative of χ. That was what I was missing.

Again - thanks for the response

Arcon
Jan25-04, 12:55 PM   #5
 
Originally posted by lethe
i took a look at it, and did the calculation. i thought it was pretty straightforward. where did you get stuck? what extra terms do you have?

remember that x is a geodesic. so there is a geodesic equation in x, and it therefore vanishes. and remember that χ is very small; drop any term with more than one χ in it.
Seems that this small detail (drop term with χdχdT) has always tripped me up in that derivation. I guess I was just blind to it. But now that I know it then the derivation is simple.

Just to make sure I understood the approximation can you check this for me?

http://www.geocities.com/physics_wor..._deviation.htm

I commented on the terms to drop right after Eq. (14) and right after Eq. (15)

Thanks

I don't know how I missed this before but the equation of geodesic deviation clearly shows that tidal forces are velocity dependant!

Arcon
Thread Closed

Similar discussions for: Geodesic Deviation
Thread Forum Replies
Mean Absolute Deviation/Standard Deviation Ratio Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics 6
Geodesic deviation equation Special & General Relativity 0
geodesic deviation equation Differential Geometry 1
sun forms different geodesic Special & General Relativity 18
geodesic deviation Special & General Relativity 2