Algebraic intuition vs geometric intuition

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the differences between algebraic and geometric intuition, questioning what defines an "algebra person." It highlights that geometers often excel in spatial visualization, while algebraists may rely on different cognitive skills. References to Thurston's work emphasize the importance of understanding mathematics and the role of proofs beyond mere calculations. The conversation also notes that foundational geometric truths can illuminate algebraic concepts, suggesting a connection between the two fields. Ultimately, it concludes that while some individuals may lean towards one type of intuition, everyone has the potential for deep mathematical insight.
Mathguy15
Messages
68
Reaction score
0
This has been a curiosity of mine lately. I am wondering about what makes an algebra person an algebra person. I know geometers(at least it seems like it) seem to have a keen ability of spatial visualization. What characterizes the abilities of an algebra person? To clarify, I'm not just talking about say elementary algebra (I'm only fifteen). I'm thinking about linear algebra and commutative algebra also. I am wondering if any of you could shed some light on this curiosity of mine. Any thoughts?

sincerely,

Mathguy
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
That's quite a bit of an exaggeration. I'd recommend reading Thurston's "On Proof and Progress in Mathematics" if you want more insight in perspective and intuitions within knowing mathematics (or fields thereof). Several of these meta-mathematics papers by famous mathematicians are practically must-reads. They really shed light into the motivation of mathematics itself.
 
Anonymous217 said:
That's quite a bit of an exaggeration. I'd recommend reading Thurston's "On Proof and Progress in Mathematics" if you want more insight in perspective and intuitions within knowing mathematics (or fields thereof). Several of these meta-mathematics papers by famous mathematicians are practically must-reads. They really shed light into the motivation of mathematics itself.

Yes, I've read a part of Thurston's essay before. He had some interesting things to say about the nature of mathematics research. In particular, I remember how he said that a mathematician's job is to make humans understand mathematics better. He also said something about how proofs are not necessarily all mathematicians do.
 
Students will find at the foundations level of Mathematics, that some truths about Geometric items can help explain corresponding truths in Algebra of Real Numbers. Two examples are The Triangle Inequality Theorem, and Completing The Square for finding roots for quadratic functions. Yet, some people are predonimantly either algebra people or geometry people.
 
Mathematics is based on insight. Some people are gifted with geometric insight just as some people have perfect pitch or photographic memories. But I think that all people are capable of the deep concentration that leads to insight whether it be geometrical, algebraic, or analytic.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top