New Reply

gradient of r

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Feb6-12, 04:43 PM   #1
 

gradient of r


Let r = √(x^2+y^2+z^2)
One can easily show that [itex]\nabla[/itex]r= [itex]\vec{r}[/itex]/r.
But I'm having a hard time understanding what this means geometrically - who can help? :)
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Galaxies fed by funnels of fuel
>> The better to see you with: Scientists build record-setting metamaterial flat lens
>> Google eyes emerging markets networks
Feb6-12, 04:55 PM   #2
 
Not that this is a proof, but intuitively the direction of the gradient of a scalar function gives the direction of maximum change of the value of that function. Since your scalar function is the distance from the origin, and it makes sense that the direction of the gradient is in the direction of [itex]\vec{r}[itex] = [itex]r\vec{u_{r}}[itex].

Grad(r) = [itex]\frac{\vec{r}}{r} = \frac{r\vec{u_{r}}}{r} = \vec{u_{r}}[itex], the unit vector in the direction of the position vector. That makes sense, because the rate of change of r as you move in the direction of r is 1.
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: gradient of r
Thread Forum Replies
Finding the gradient and maximum gradient at a point P for the surface z=2x^2+3y^2 Calculus & Beyond Homework 2
What is the difference between an 'increasing gradient' and a positive gradient? Calculus & Beyond Homework 6
Problem with gradient vector, gradient, and directional derivative, etc. Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Gradient of |xi + yj + zk|^-n Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Gradient of 1/r Advanced Physics Homework 8