Movement of a magnet due to repulsion (help)

AI Thread Summary
A magnet placed inside a tube sealed with magnets will eventually find a resting place due to the balance between magnetic repulsion and gravity, although it may oscillate initially. The oscillation will be damped by air resistance and induced magnetic fields, as described by Lenz's law. The design may face challenges, such as the magnet trying to rotate and causing friction against the tube's sides. Earnshaw's theorem suggests that stable magnetic levitation is difficult to achieve without external forces, and friction can lead to multiple resting positions. Overall, using a pendulum could be a more effective solution to control movement with less friction.
Kieranlavelle
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Basically I was wondering if I was to place a magnet inside a tube sealed at both ends via two magnets (as the diagram shows) would the magnet keep on moving up and down or would it find a resting place. I think it would find a resting place but then I also thought there will also be gravity acting on it when it was falling down and I wondered if that would make a difference. Also If it would find a resting place is there anyway I could stop it from doing so without an external power source.http://img535.imageshack.us/img535/7071/diagramv.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It will find a 'resting place' where the effect of gravity is balanced by the magnetic repulsion but it will oscillate for a while until the oscillation is damped by a) air resistance and b) magnetic fields set up by opposing induced currents in the magnets – look up Lenz's law in a search engine
 
Ok thanks for your help I appreciate it.
 
If this is a real project you might want to use a pendulum instead.

The tube has at least one problem. The magnet will try to turn over and doing so will cause friction against the sides of the tube or whatever guide you use. A pendulum will try to twist in a similar way, but should be easier to control with less of a friction problem.

DC
 
I thought Earnshaw's theorem argues against a stable magnetic levitation...but I don't know the application scope of the theorem nor your assumptions about 'stabilizing' frictional forces.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetic_levitation

Also If it would find a resting place is there anyway I could stop it from doing so without an external power

You can get some insights at the same link, above. Usually, absent friction, the issue is not stability but instability...

In your diagram, my guess is that sufficient friction will likely cause a multiplicity of 'stable' resting places... but the less friction, the less stability.
 
This is from Griffiths' Electrodynamics, 3rd edition, page 352. I am trying to calculate the divergence of the Maxwell stress tensor. The tensor is given as ##T_{ij} =\epsilon_0 (E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} E^2)+\frac 1 {\mu_0}(B_iB_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij} B^2)##. To make things easier, I just want to focus on the part with the electrical field, i.e. I want to find the divergence of ##E_{ij}=E_iE_j-\frac 1 2 \delta_{ij}E^2##. In matrix form, this tensor should look like this...
Thread 'Applying the Gauss (1835) formula for force between 2 parallel DC currents'
Please can anyone either:- (1) point me to a derivation of the perpendicular force (Fy) between two very long parallel wires carrying steady currents utilising the formula of Gauss for the force F along the line r between 2 charges? Or alternatively (2) point out where I have gone wrong in my method? I am having problems with calculating the direction and magnitude of the force as expected from modern (Biot-Savart-Maxwell-Lorentz) formula. Here is my method and results so far:- This...
Back
Top