Einstein misquoted?


by mess1n
Tags: einstein, misquoted
mess1n
mess1n is offline
#1
Mar3-12, 05:05 AM
P: 24
Hi, someone posted the following quote on facebook this morning, attributed to Albert Einstein:

"Everything is energy and that’s all there is to it. Match the frequency of the reality you want and you cannot help but get that reality. It can be no other way. This is not philosophy. This is physics."

From what I've read about Einstein I really doubt he said this. But I'm not sure how to find out. Any ideas? It really pisses me off when "The Secret" club start misusing science to give their self-absorbed fantasies some credibility.

Many Thanks,
Andrew
Phys.Org News Partner Science news on Phys.org
Better thermal-imaging lens from waste sulfur
Hackathon team's GoogolPlex gives Siri extra powers
Bright points in Sun's atmosphere mark patterns deep in its interior
rollcast
rollcast is offline
#2
Mar3-12, 05:16 AM
P: 418
There has been a discussion about this on another forum - found it on google.

http://www.skepticforum.com/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=16381

I done a bit of searching on google and couldn't find anything he said that was even similar to that.
Ryan_m_b
Ryan_m_b is offline
#3
Mar3-12, 05:16 AM
Mentor
Ryan_m_b's Avatar
P: 5,341
I've tried googling this in several ways and all I can find is either:

1) Websites quoting it within their articles with no source, generally new age/crackpot websites
2) People asking in forums "I read on a website with no source that was a bit new age/crackpot that Einstein said this, did he?"

That would suggest to me that it is fake. Also, whilst not conclusive at all, it isn't listed in wikiquote which is odd given the vast amounts of quotes there and the high hit rate you get from google just from typing in the supposed quote.

Lastly: who cares about vague, semi-poetic statements made by Einstein? It's an argument from authority wrapped up in mystical woo. Einstein was good because of what he demonstrated to be true. Delphic statements like this should be taken as seriously if they came from Einstein as if they came from the local tramp.

Fredrik
Fredrik is offline
#4
Mar3-12, 05:48 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Fredrik's Avatar
P: 8,990

Einstein misquoted?


I did some googling. I haven't found anything that conclusively proves what I'm about to say, but it looks like the person being misquoted here is a guy named Darryl Anka, who claims to be channeling a "multi-dimensional extra-terrestrial being" named Bashar. Anka has a web site that I don't want to link to, but I'm sure you will find it if you search for it.

I'm reluctant to link to any woo woo sites, but I think I have to post a couple of links, since they are the only evidence we have of where this quote came from. The quote started appearing on the web some time in 2001. (You can use date ranges when you search with Google). This document (titled ‘The Ides of March’, channeling from Bashar by Darryl Anka) is filled with so much nonsense that I can't make myself read it, but it came up in the search results, so I searched the document for "frequency", and found that it ends with the words
This is not philosophy! This is physics! Everything is energy and that's all there is to it. Match the frequency of the reality you want and you cannot help but get that reality. It can be no other way. This is physics.
This web page contains the quote
Match the frequency of the reality you want and you cannot help but get that reality.
It's attributed to Bashar, not to Einstein.

Edit: That document is from March 2002, according to Google. The quote was attributed to Einstein in the earliest pages I found, from January 2001. The "Wise words" page is from December 2001.

Edit 2: Here's the text that contains what I assume is the original quote, at the Bashar web site.
ThomasT
ThomasT is offline
#5
Mar3-12, 06:12 AM
P: 1,414
Quote Quote by Fredrik View Post
I did some googling. I haven't found anything that conclusively proves what I'm about to say, but it looks like the person being misquoted here is a guy named Darryl Anka, who claims to be channeling a "multi-dimensional extra-terrestrial being" named Bashar. Anka has a web site that I don't want to link to, but I'm sure you will find it if you search for it.

I'm reluctant to link to any woo woo sites, but I think I have to post a couple of links, since they are the only evidence we have of where this quote came from. The quote started appearing on the web some time in 2001. (You can use date ranges when you search with Google). This document (titled ‘The Ides of March’, channeling from Bashar by Darryl Anka) is filled with so much nonsense that I can't make myself read it, but it came up in the search results, so I searched the document for "frequency", and found that it ends with the words
This is not philosophy! This is physics! Everything is energy and that's all there is to it. Match the frequency of the reality you want and you cannot help but get that reality. It can be no other way. This is physics.
This web page contains the quote
Match the frequency of the reality you want and you cannot help but get that reality.
It's attributed to Bashar, not to Einstein.

Edit: That document is from March 2002, according to Google. The quote was attributed to Einstein in the earliest pages I found, from January 2001. The "Wise words" page is from December 2001.
Nice research. I have no idea if Einstein said it, but, if you think about it, it makes sense, imho. How do we see, hear, taste, touch and smell? It's all vibratory (ie., frequency dependent), isn't it?
Ryan_m_b
Ryan_m_b is offline
#6
Mar3-12, 06:15 AM
Mentor
Ryan_m_b's Avatar
P: 5,341
Quote Quote by ThomasT View Post
Nice research. I have no idea if Einstein said it, but, if you think about it, it makes sense, imho. How do we see, hear, taste, touch and smell? It's all vibratory (ie., frequency dependent), isn't it?
Let's not try to rationalise a statement that clearly makes no sense. Everything is no energy, you can't "match a vibration" and "make the reality you want", this is neither physics nor philosophy. The fact that some perceptions include frequency as part of their phenomenon is irrelevant.

Also: excellent work Fredrik!
ThomasT
ThomasT is offline
#7
Mar3-12, 06:25 AM
P: 1,414
Quote Quote by Ryan_m_b View Post
Let's not try to rationalise a statement that clearly makes no sense. Everything is no energy, you can't "match a vibration" and "make the reality you want", this is neither physics nor philosophy. The fact that some perceptions include frequency as part of their phenomenon is irrelevant.

Also: excellent work Fredrik!
I take it to mean that resonant frequencies determine reality. Reality only has one definitive meaning. Our perceptions. And the root of all of our perceptions are our sensory faculties. The reality we experience is a function of the frequencies we're capable of reproducing. If we could reproduce different frequencies, we would experience different realities.

But of course, we can't. Anyway, I don't see anything particularly strange about the statement in question ... given what's known about our sensory faculties.

Whether it's attributable to Einstein is another question.

As to the statement that everything is energy. Well, what's the basic definition of energy? Doesn't energy imply, require, entail ... motion?
Jimmy Snyder
Jimmy Snyder is offline
#8
Mar3-12, 06:31 AM
P: 2,163
This vibe just in, Bashar is Einstein.
Ryan_m_b
Ryan_m_b is offline
#9
Mar3-12, 06:34 AM
Mentor
Ryan_m_b's Avatar
P: 5,341
Quote Quote by ThomasT View Post
I take it to mean that resonant frequencies determine reality. Reality only has one definitive meaning. Our perceptions. And the root of all of our perceptions are our sensory faculties. The reality we experience is a function of the frequencies we're capable of reproducing. If we could reproduce different frequencies, we would experience different realities.

But of course, we can't. Anyway, I don't see anything particularly strange about the statement in question ... given what's known about our sensory faculties.
Reality is not our perceptions, we perceive reality. Whether we do that rightly or wrongly is neither here nor there. In addition our senses and perceptions (two different things) are not determined by frequencies. Whilst some do entail a frequency component e.g. hearing others do not e.g. smell.

Stop trying to rationalise a crackpot statement. This thread concerns the authorship of the statement, not whether or not we can play semantic games to make it profound.
ThomasT
ThomasT is offline
#10
Mar3-12, 07:57 AM
P: 1,414
Quote Quote by mess1n View Post
Hi, someone posted the following quote on facebook this morning, attributed to Albert Einstein:

"Everything is energy and that’s all there is to it. Match the frequency of the reality you want and you cannot help but get that reality. It can be no other way. This is not philosophy. This is physics."

From what I've read about Einstein I really doubt he said this. But I'm not sure how to find out. Any ideas? It really pisses me off when "The Secret" club start bullgarbageting science to give their self-absorbed fantasies some credibility.

Many Thanks,
Andrew
I're read a lot of Einstein's stuff, and he didn't talk, phrase things, this way. But the bottom line is that nobody here knows for sure.

Perhaps you might give some background wrt what it was that perturbed you about this? And, just a heads up, if you use profanity at PF you'll get infractions, and if you get enough infractions you'll get barred from PF forever.
Fredrik
Fredrik is offline
#11
Mar3-12, 08:08 AM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Fredrik's Avatar
P: 8,990
Quote Quote by ThomasT View Post
I're read a lot of Einstein's stuff, and he didn't talk, phrase things, this way. But the bottom line is that nobody here knows for sure.
I guess not, but I think it's a pretty safe bet that he didn't say this. This is precisely the sort of thing we'd expect to hear from someone who claims to be channeling a multi-dimensional extra-terrestrial, not from someone who understands physics.

Quote Quote by ThomasT View Post
Perhaps you might give some background wrt what it was that perturbed you about this?
You asked Ryan, and I'm sure he'll tell you his reasons. In the meantime, I'll tell you mine. In my opinion, the idea that "the reality you want" has a frequency, is as nonsensical as anything gets. The idea that you can get the reality you want, by "matching" that frequency is even worse.
ThomasT
ThomasT is offline
#12
Mar3-12, 08:47 AM
P: 1,414
Quote Quote by Fredrik View Post
I guess not, but I think it's a pretty safe bet that he didn't say this. This is precisely the sort of thing we'd expect to hear from someone who claims to be channeling a multi-dimensional extra-terrestrial, not from someone who understands physics.
The thing is, if you just look at the statement, and assume that it came from somebody with no physics education, it shows, imo, a bit of insight.

Quote Quote by Fredrik View Post
You asked Ryan, and I'm sure he'll tell you his reasons.
Actually, my question was directed to the OP, since he said that:
Quote Quote by mess1n
It really pisses me off when "The Secret" club start misusing science to give their self-absorbed fantasies some credibility.
And I wasn't sure what he was referring to by that.

Quote Quote by Fredrik View Post
In the meantime, I'll tell you mine. In my opinion, the idea that "the reality you want" has a frequency, is as nonsensical as anything gets. The idea that you can get the reality you want, by "matching" that frequency is even worse.
I'm not going to express my opinion on this. I wrote two replies (which I subsequently deleted) to Ryan which I think cast some serious doubt on his (and now apparently your) opinion on it. But it's not worth an infraction. So, whatever you guys want to say about it is fine with me. I'm not going to discuss it any further.
jim hardy
jim hardy is offline
#13
Mar3-12, 10:41 PM
Sci Advisor
jim hardy's Avatar
P: 3,138
That just doesn't sound like the humble, kindly man of "Ideas and Opinions", and I dont believe it is.


"The most beautiful experience we can have is the mysterious. It is the fundamental emotion that stands at the cradle of true art and true science. Whoever does not know it and can no longer wonder, no longer marvel, is as good as dead, and his eyes are dimmed. It was the experience of mystery -- even if mixed with fear -- that engendered religion. A knowledge of the existence of something we cannot penetrate, our perceptions of the profoundest reason and the most radiant beauty, which only in their most primitive forms are accessible to our minds: it is this knowledge and this emotion that constitute true religiosity. In this sense, and only this sense, I am a deeply religious man... I am satisfied with the mystery of life's eternity and with a knowledge, a sense, of the marvelous structure of existence -- as well as the humble attempt to understand even a tiny portion of the Reason that manifests itself in nature."
http://www.aip.org/history/einstein/essay.htm

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/4...s_and_Opinions
alt
alt is offline
#14
Mar6-12, 05:34 AM
PF Gold
P: 322
Quote Quote by mess1n View Post
Hi, someone posted the following quote on facebook this morning, attributed to Albert Einstein:

"Everything is energy and that’s all there is to it. Match the frequency of the reality you want and you cannot help but get that reality. It can be no other way. This is not philosophy. This is physics."

From what I've read about Einstein I really doubt he said this. But I'm not sure how to find out. Any ideas? It really pisses me off when "The Secret" club start misusing science to give their self-absorbed fantasies some credibility.

Many Thanks,
Andrew
As others have confirmed, some 'Bashar' fruitcake. I recall coming across his 'poetic material' some years ago.

Anyway, checked out AE's quotes on Wikiquote.org and found the following (part of the EMC2 quote, early in the page)

"It followed from the special theory of relativity that mass and energy are both but different manifestations of the same thing — a somewhat unfamiliar conception for the average mind. (Not to infer in any way that it lends any credibility to the fruitcake, above)

I like Einstein's quotes a lot - beyond merely the scientific (since I'm no scientist) and particularly those dealing with life, philosophy, broader knowledge, etc. Here is one of my favourites (also on the Wiki page);

I believe in intuition and inspiration. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution. It is, strictly speaking, a real factor in scientific research.

PS - I believe he also had a real quirky, some would say weird, sense of humour.
SuperiorPrep
SuperiorPrep is offline
#15
May20-12, 10:46 PM
P: 6
"Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler." -- my favorite AE quote
biocykle
#16
Jun29-12, 06:05 PM
P: n/a
"As others have confirmed, some 'Bashar' fruitcake. I recall coming across his 'poetic material' some years ago.

...

"I believe in intuition and inspiration. Imagination is more important than knowledge. For knowledge is limited, whereas imagination embraces the entire world, stimulating progress, giving birth to evolution..."

...

How poignant, then, that an utterly positive, poetic, life-enforcing, empowering, funny, smart etc. message (out of which the misattributed phrase was lifted) is single-handedly written off as "some fruitcake" by the very same person who admires Einstein's belief in imagination, intuition and inspiration over cold knowledge.

Or, ironic? Does it have to be 'scientific' imagination to count?
Fredrik
Fredrik is offline
#17
Jun29-12, 06:40 PM
Emeritus
Sci Advisor
PF Gold
Fredrik's Avatar
P: 8,990
Quote Quote by biocykle View Post
How poignant, then, that an utterly positive, poetic, life-enforcing, empowering, funny, smart etc. message (out of which the misattributed phrase was lifted) is single-handedly written off as "some fruitcake" by the very same person who admires Einstein's belief in imagination, intuition and inspiration over cold knowledge.
There's nothing smart about the quote that this thread is about. It's just a bunch of incoherent nonsense. The term "fruitcake" isn't very sensitive, but it's understandable. We get tired of seeing nonsense dressed up as physics.

Quote Quote by biocykle View Post
Does it have to be 'scientific' imagination to count?
It does when the imaginative statement contains the phrase "this is science".
Curious3141
Curious3141 is offline
#18
Jun30-12, 06:37 AM
HW Helper
P: 2,874
Quote Quote by Ryan_m_b View Post
Delphic statements like this should be taken as seriously if they came from Einstein as if they came from the local tramp.
Ironically, sans any prior knowledge of Einstein, he could easily have been mistaken for the local tramp, what with the unkempt hair and all.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Einstein's Nordic Assembly Speech,Einstein Quotations Etc. General Discussion 1
Einstein GR is dead, viva Einstein-Cartan Gravity? Special & General Relativity 7
Einstein-scalar field action --> Einstein-scalar field equations Special & General Relativity 1
Einstein or Einstein–Cartan? Special & General Relativity 1